ShipperGuide TMS, by Loadsmart vs. Trimble Fleet Mobility

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ShipperGuide TMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Loadsmart combines technology with transportation services to optimize freight spend, increase efficiency, and enhance service quality. They do this through managed transportation services, the company's own ShipperGuide TMS, dock scheduling software, truck management solutions, dynamic freight brokerage, and tailor-made optimization solutions.
$0
Trimble Fleet Mobility
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
ShipperGuide TMS, by LoadsmartTrimble Fleet Mobility
Editions & Modules
ShipperGuide Instant Rates
$0
ShipperGuide TMS
n/a
per year Freight Spend
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ShipperGuide TMSTrimble Fleet Mobility
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsShipperGuide TMS is priced based on your freight spend and is very competitively priced for all the features you get—RFPs, carrier scorecarding, freight audit, optimization, AI-powered insights, and built-in dock scheduling with Opendock. Most customers see measurable ROI within 3-6 months via freight savings, reduced labor, and fewer billing errors. We also offer ShipperGuide Instant Rates, which is $0 forever, for companies looking to start with basic TMS functionality.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ShipperGuide TMS, by LoadsmartTrimble Fleet Mobility
Considered Both Products
ShipperGuide TMS

No answer on this topic

Trimble Fleet Mobility
Chose Trimble Fleet Mobility
We used to use TruckStops until we switched to Appian Direct Route. I was very happy with TruckStops mainly because it was a simple system that got the job done. There were no integration issues, no errors left and right, no hassle. Appian on the other hand, while it is a nice …
Chose Trimble Fleet Mobility
Appian was best suited for an analysis environment both functionally and from a cost structure standpoint. Other packages are targeting ongoing operations and their cost structures reflect that goal. The purely analytical environment can underestimated in these situations. …
User Ratings
ShipperGuide TMS, by LoadsmartTrimble Fleet Mobility
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ShipperGuide TMS, by LoadsmartTrimble Fleet Mobility
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It is VERY adept at creating solutions for single or multiple point collection or distribution scenarios. We have multiple customers with large, central DCs that utilize Appian for their regular route rationalization processes. We have had less success when analyzing "touring" fleets where only historical data was available. Without the flexibility to change/select new combinations, the solution quality is diminished.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Appian is excellent for use in both the analysis arena and ongoing operations support. The speed to solution and quality of solution is at the top of the market.
  • The configurability of the system gives the user the flexibility to address almost any route problem imaginable. Analysts have the ability to recreate the "world" to fit their customer's needs rather than forcing the customer into a predetermined framework.
  • The installation of the software is flexible and can be structured to fit any work group's format, from a centralized core to a distributed mobile analysis team.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Transit times are sometimes inaccurate/inconsistent.
  • Software can slow down as a route file undergoes many changes.
  • Large quantity of input files can sometimes create confusion/inconsistency when route files are shared by multiple users.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Appian products have become an instrumental tool within the company, from a daily tactical standpoint building route plans, to a strategic standpoint in assisting with project analysis. Since the tool is able to interface with many different on-board computer vendors, it is something that could be used by the company long term.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We used to use TruckStops until we switched to Appian Direct Route. I was very happy with TruckStops mainly because it was a simple system that got the job done. There were no integration issues, no errors left and right, no hassle. Appian on the other hand, while it is a nice system, it needs a lot of work. During optimization, mileage is critical and I am afraid Appian fails in this aspect with the lack of proper integration with PC Miler which is industry standard.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Decreased employee efficiency because of numerous errors and constant troubleshooting
  • Successfully optimized routes
Read full review
ScreenShots

ShipperGuide TMS Screenshots

Screenshot of