Loadster vs. Tricentis NeoLoad
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Loadster | N/A | N/A | Loadster is a load testing, stress testing, and monitoring platform for websites, web apps, and APIs. Load testing and stress testing reduce the risk of crashing in a traffic spike or high traffic event. Monitoring helps teams detect problems quickly and minimize downtime. Loadster uses the same scripts for load testing, stress testing, and site monitoring. The platform supports real browser testing with Browser Bots and Playwright, both of… | $97 Pay-As-You-Go |
Tricentis NeoLoad | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Tricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021. | $20,000 per year with 300 virtual users |
| Loadster | Tricentis NeoLoad | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Loadster offers pay-as-you-go Loadster Fuel (credits) to power load testing and monitoring. Run tests, burn fuel. There are also optional fuel plans for discounted fuel every month. Custom and enterprise plans are also available. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Loadster | Tricentis NeoLoad | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Would buy again 26 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 25 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Implementation went as expected 23 Answers | |
| Loadster | Tricentis NeoLoad | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | JMeter Score8.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | JMeter Score8.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Loadster | Tricentis NeoLoad | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 5.5 |
| Usability | - | 7.3 |
| Support Rating | - | 3.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.3 |
| Loadster | Tricentis NeoLoad | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Tricentis NeoLoad Screenshots |









