Longhorn Block Storage vs. UpCloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Longhorn Block Storage
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Longhorn is cloud native distributed block storage for Kubernetes, supported by Rancher Labs headquartered in Cupertino.N/A
UpCloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
UpCloud is a global cloud hosting company from Finland boasting fast cloud servers on an hourly billed infrastructure-as-a-service. Their IaaS services include MaxIOPS block storage, their Simple backup service, SDN services, and resource isolation via the company's private cloud services, or hybrid cloud services as well.N/A
Pricing
Longhorn Block StorageUpCloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Longhorn Block StorageUpCloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Longhorn Block StorageUpCloud
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Longhorn Block StorageUpCloud
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Longhorn Block Storage
-
Ratings
UpCloud
6.0
1 Ratings
30% below category average
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Dynamic scaling00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Elastic load balancing00 Ratings4.51 Ratings
Pre-configured templates00 Ratings2.71 Ratings
Monitoring tools00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings4.51 Ratings
Operating system support00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Security controls00 Ratings5.51 Ratings
Automation00 Ratings5.51 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Longhorn Block StorageUpCloud
Small Businesses
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Score 9.0 out of 10
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 9.3 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 9.3 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Longhorn Block StorageUpCloud
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Longhorn Block StorageUpCloud
Likelihood to Recommend
SUSE
Longhorn Block Storage is well suited for most Kubernetes workloads where data storage is required, but when very high storage speed is essential, Longhorn Block Storage might not be the best solution. For those rare situations, we use local storage mounts. Longhorn Block Storage's ability to easily create/restore volume snapshots is a very frequently used feature among our dev teams because they can easily play multiple scenarios with the same data - modify data, restore it and modify it again.
Read full review
UpCloud
If you're looking for a cost-effective solution then this is a good choice, be sure to keep on top of your balance! The 100% uptime is also a nice addition, although not unique in a cloud hosting service.
Read full review
Pros
SUSE
  • Creates read-write many (RWX) volumes
  • Longhorn Block Storage is an easy to deploy solution
  • Scheduled and on-demand volume snapshots can be created using web GUI
  • Volume backups can be stored offsite on any S3 compatible storage solution
  • Backups and snapshots can be restored using web GUI
Read full review
UpCloud
  • Pricing
  • Ease of use - super easy to manage existing servers and deploy new ones
  • Great customer service
Read full review
Cons
SUSE
  • Version to version upgrades takes more expertise to do than initial deployment
  • If something goes wrong, you will need a help from support
  • Longhorn Block Storage speed is slightly slower than local disk storage speed
Read full review
UpCloud
  • The billing reports are quite hard to read, could be simplified
  • A control panel function would be useful
  • The re-billing process could be better, not so cut throat if you miss a payment!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SUSE
No answers on this topic
UpCloud
We trialed UpCloud to see if it would be better than DigitalOcean but for our needs, it was not. On DigitalOcean once a droplet is created, almost no thought needs to go into maintenance, outages, or other reliability-based issues.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SUSE
  • It has provided a highly available storage solution for almost all our Kubernetes deployments
  • We can deploy new app versions with peace in mind because we have working data backups
  • Application development is faster because devs can play with data and easily restore it when needed
Read full review
UpCloud
  • The low cost means you don't really need to worry about pricing
  • To us as a business it was not as useful as DigitalOcean
Read full review
ScreenShots