Lytho Digital Asset Management vs. Marq

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lytho Digital Asset Management
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Lytho is built to help users communicate on-brand with their DAM Solution. The vendor states that users can streamline marketing efforts and save time creating, searching, sharing and publishing digital content, adding that users can: Be consistent with its Brand Center. Be efficient with its Digital Asset Manager. Be creative with its Create and Publish functionality. Lytho is a single source from which to manage, create and publish all marketing content.N/A
Marq
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Marq, formerly Lucidpress, is a design & brand templating platform that enables users to create & share branded collateral. Marq offers consistency so brands can deliver its message more effectively wherever it goes. The vendor states over 5 million people use Lucidpress to create, customize, control & distribute their brand’s content.N/A
Pricing
Lytho Digital Asset ManagementMarq
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lytho Digital Asset ManagementMarq
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Lytho Digital Asset ManagementMarq
Small Businesses
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.4 out of 10
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Lytho Digital Asset ManagementMarq
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Lytho Digital Asset ManagementMarq
Likelihood to Recommend
inMotionNow
Our creative and marketing department consists of several team members with various roles in the organization and process. We receive creative requests from the program managers and other marketing specialists daily. Lytho helps us keep track of all of these projects while listing due dates, proofing dates, completion dates and has the ability for multiple reviewers to be added to the proofing routes. We're able to customize each proofing route to best suit each client. We also have the ability to add outside clients to the proofing routes, which makes the process much smoother. At times I'd say it is less appropriate for very small requests or projects that did not need to go through a full-blown proofing route.
Read full review
Marq (LPS Holdco LLC)
For self-publishers, Marq is the best option, in my opinion. I have recommended it to others and they have been also amazed at how beautiful their end product looks and how easy it is to export and get the printers. A win win for everyone involved in the process of creating magazines and marketing materials.
Read full review
Pros
inMotionNow
  • project management
  • project review process
  • project tasks assigned to each project
Read full review
Marq (LPS Holdco LLC)
  • User management
  • Easy to create and edit templates
  • Able to install an approval layer to govern use
Read full review
Cons
inMotionNow
  • simplify the project dashboard
  • simply the dashboard to view outstanding reviews
  • additional training for our sales reps how to use the review process
Read full review
Marq (LPS Holdco LLC)
  • Automated page numbering would be amazing
  • Scroll button should be darker to find it easier
  • More template options
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
inMotionNow
We currently use Canto for our final art file storage as well as a web dam for our art files, client files, client portals, etc. Canto and Lytho work seamlessly together in my personal opinion. So, the two should not be stacked against each other but moreso working in tandem. Canto does not have the ability to assign projects and/or proofing abilities.
Read full review
Marq (LPS Holdco LLC)
I think if we had found Canva first we would have probably chosen it as our platform. We had already invested a lot of time and energy into developing multiple templates and branding standards in LucidPress
Read full review
Return on Investment
inMotionNow
  • 100% improved accuracy in our final art files
  • 100% improved client satisfaction
  • 100% improved project management and tracking
Read full review
Marq (LPS Holdco LLC)
  • I am able to save over $10K per issue by doing the design and layout myself.
  • I am able to save at least 2-3 weeks per issue by doing the design and layout myself.
  • I don't need to employ a team to compile each issue, I do it all myself.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Marq Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of