Makeswift vs. OpenText Web CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Makeswift
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Makeswift is a composable visual editor for headless websites and storefronts. From BigCommerce, the page builder aims to put marketers in the driver's seat without compromising on site performance or developer experience.
$79
per month
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
Pricing
MakeswiftOpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
Starter
$79
per month
Team
$299
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
plans start at 10 users, 100 monthly publishes, and 10 locales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MakeswiftOpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MakeswiftOpenText Web CMS
Considered Both Products
Makeswift
Chose Makeswift
Essentially the learning curve. I chose Makeswift because it feels much more like a design tool (like Figma) than a development environment. It gives the designers the control to create what they want. It allows to move faster, collaborate in real time without locking each …
OpenText Web CMS
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText TeamSite has been more powerful and resourceful as compared to Storyblok. The cost of deployment was relatively low and it has more content editing features. The customer support team members are always online 24/7/367 and they offer the best training of working with …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers an intuitive user experience, modern, versatile and consistent in performance. It simplifies the whole process of managing the digital experience across all marketing channels, which is done from a unified interface. This tool has enabled us to take control of our …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText went through an RFP process against IBM Content Management back in 2012. OpenText not only met our business and technical requirements, but we asked both vendors to show a use case and OpenText provided an extensive solution that IBM could not. Also the content …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
Elasticsearch is scalable, ready for cloud deployments, and documentation is readily available and comprehensive.

Our using HP Autonomy is based on the sunk cost fallacy.
Features
MakeswiftOpenText Web CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Makeswift
8.0
Ratings
3% below category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
Ratings
5% above category average
Role-based user permissions8.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Makeswift
8.5
Ratings
9% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
API9.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language8.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Makeswift
7.5
Ratings
4% below category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
WYSIWYG editor10.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness9.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Admin section7.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Page templates6.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Library of website themes5.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design9.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Form generator6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Makeswift
6.7
Ratings
11% below category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
5% above category average
Content taxonomy5.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
SEO support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions7.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MakeswiftOpenText Web CMS
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MakeswiftOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MakeswiftOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Makeswift is an excellent choice when you need to create high quality landing pages. Since it removes the code process, you can move from a design concept to a live site easily. It is particularly helpful for designers who want total creative freedom, as the interface feels more like Figma than a normal website builder. Plus, it’s a lifesaver for collaborative teams because the real time editing allows different people to create and design at the same time without any friction. On the other hand, it might not be the right tool if you are trying to build a complex web application like a custom dashboard or an e-commerce store with thousands of filters. It’s also important to note that while it is no code for design work, the initial setup like getting custom components or the localhost environment running usually requires a developer’s assistance.
Read full review
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Pros
  • It feels more like "Designing" than "Coding"
  • What you see is actually what you get
  • Handling Different Screen Sizes (Responsive Design)
  • Editing with other peers
Read full review
  • Offering compelling experiences to customers, which help in improving satisfaction
  • Information is delivered across multiple channels
  • Testing relevant result sets to improve the rate of website conversion
Read full review
Cons
  • Starting from scratch - Base templates
  • Advanced layout logic
  • Learning curve for custom elements
  • Localhost stability
Read full review
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
Usability
Once you are inside the builder, the daily experience is incredibly smooth. It really does feel like a strong design tool rather than a clunky website builder. The drag and drop feature is fluid and the collaboration mode makes working with my team feel natural rather than a headache. It’s intuitive enough that I can jump in and make significant changes without feeling like I need a manual next to me.
Read full review
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Essentially the learning curve. I chose Makeswift because it feels much more like a design tool (like Figma) than a development environment. It gives the designers the control to create what they want. It allows to move faster, collaborate in real time without locking each other out of pages, and still gives the developers the freedom to drop in custom components when we need something specific.
Read full review
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cost savings on external dev work
  • Improved on faster iteration
  • Efficiency via p2p collaboration
Read full review
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
ScreenShots