TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is an exposure management solution that helps organizations proactively detect, prioritize, and fix vulnerabilities from one console. It combines asset discovery, AI-powered vulnerability assessment and threat prioritization with built-in patching to speed up remediation. It discovers and manages desktops, laptops, servers, virtual machines, DMZ servers, and network devices, giving real-time visibility into known, unknown, zero-day, and actively exploited…

    $90

    per month 1 technician

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ACortex XDR (formerly Traps) replaces traditional antivirus with multi-method prevention, a proprietary combination of malware and exploit prevention methods that protect users and endpoints from known and unknown threats.N/A
    Pricing
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPalo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPalo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPalo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Considered Both Products
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    No answer on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    Features
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPalo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Feature
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
    7.0
    4 Ratings
    14% below category average
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    -
    Ratings
    Network Analytics6.42 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Recognition6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting7.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Analysis6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification7.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Feature
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
    8.0
    3 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    -
    Ratings
    IT Asset Realization8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Authentication7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring8.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Scanning7.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPalo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft Defender XDR
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    InsightIDR
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Microsoft Defender XDR
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPalo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    9.4
    (14 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusPalo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is highly effective for organizations prioritizing ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and a single pane of glass for both vulnerability detection and patching. It is well-suited for organizations needing to manage a diverse, yet traditional, on-premise IT infrastructure (servers, workstations, laptops). It is good at securing remote endpoints by using an agent to scan, detect and patch workstations. It is good for both scanning and remediating vulnerabilities through the built-in patching tools. It is ideal for a smaller to mid sized environment using Active Directory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    Malware that doesn’t leave files behind has become widely available. Anyone who can afford to reverse this trend should purchase technology. Application whitelisting isn’t for everyone, and Palo Alto Networks Traps can help. Enterprises looking for a low-affected, next-generation solution with high protection should consider it. PAN Traps is a great product at a reasonable price, and I highly recommend it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • Patch detection
    • Patch application
    • History and inventory.
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Direct Access to devices via Live Terminal which provides operations with scripting, triage, and preservation of artifacts.
    • Behavioral Indicators of Compromise which provides alerts on events regarding groups of hosts and their signatures.
    • Querying complex data sets involving a variety of devices for network connections, hashes, DNS, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • Better integration with third-party tools.
    • Licenses for budget-friendly customers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Traps doesn't seem to function as a traditional A/V very well, so it's better as another layer to your endpoint protection
    • Traps can cause issues with some legacy or custom programs, so exceptions may have to be made
    • Traps falsely identifies things as malicious at times, this is not often though
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    We're already on our third renewal.
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Its usable for system patchig
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    As every attacks get started because of user mistake or employee mistake. they click on any link they open any software without knowing its behavioural. But after Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR we able to identify what user is doing We can put sudden type of restriction as per our organization policy. If some malicious file is found it can be quarantined. easy remote terminal access for investogation rather going one by one user for endpoint if they are busy then we have to wait but now from console only we can do this all.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    No answers on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    The support we receive from Palo Alto is one of the best aspects of Traps. It is very easy to recommend their support. It seems much easier to connect directly with someone with a deep understanding of the product rather than other companies where you basically have to make an airtight case that it is some kind of non-standard issue that can't be solved with existing documentation. Palo Alto digs deep and helps with advanced troubleshooting to get things working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    I chose Vulnerability because it is very easy to use and analyzes threats effectively. I previously used Microsoft System Center; however, due to its complexity and lack of transparency, we decided to remove it from our company and keep only Vulnerability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    Traps is the slickest interface, easy to use and intuitive rule making, and the rest just didn't quite stack up to the performance level of Traps. McAfee and Kaspersky just hog processor and RAM power. I didn't like the interface and functionality of SentinelOne as much as Traps. Palo Alto really put a lot of time into the development of this software, and had some of the founding fathers of IT Security heading the development process. Can't beat that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • By automating the scanning, assessment, and patch management process, VMP has helped reduce the time to patch for us by 40%.
    • It has provided continuous visibility into device health and overall patch state. This has helped reduce the amount of time manually checking and updating.
    • By prioritizing the list of vulnerabilities the tool has helped our staff stay focused on the high-impact risks and ensure that critical assets are patched first.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • After putting Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR on a user's system, users came back with a positive response that there are no performance issues now.
    • We are able to track and control granular suspicious and malicious activities.
    • Web controls are missing, which if they would have been there would have been very helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Screenshots

    Screenshot of Vulnerability management dashboardScreenshot of Vulnerability Risk scoringScreenshot of Firmware VulnerabilitiesScreenshot of Web server misconfigurationsScreenshot of Vulnerabilities

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Screenshots

    Screenshot of a Cortex XDR overviewScreenshot of a view of the Cortex XDR dashboardScreenshot of a view of the Cortex XDR dashboardScreenshot of a view of the Cortex XDR dashboard