MetaCompliance vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MetaCompliance | Score4.5 out of 10 | N/A | MetaCompliance, headquartered in London, is a cyber security and compliance organisation that helps transform company culture and safeguard data and values. They offer eLearning, GDPR, policy management, incident management and phishing solutions that help clients create better relationships with employees and regulators. The product suite (Advantage, MetaPhish, MetaLearning, MetaIncident and MetaPrivacy) is hosted under a single management platform (MyCompliance) on the cloud and can be… | N/A |
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management. | $2.50 per user/per month |
| MetaCompliance | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| MetaCompliance | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Would buy again 157 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Delivers good value for the price 146 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Happy with the feature set 155 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 130 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Implementation went as expected 140 Answers | |
| MetaCompliance | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MetaCompliance | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Hoxhunt Score8.9 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Proofpoint Security Awareness Training Score10 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| MetaCompliance | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.4 |
| Usability | - | 8.6 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.3 |
| Configurability | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.1 |
| MetaCompliance | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots |







