MetaCompliance vs. SAI360

MetaCompliance is well suited to be managed by a small IT team. It is also well suited for companies that need to provide their employees with security awareness training. It has the added benefits for companies that may not have a formal policy approval process, MetaCompliance's policy management modules will help there. Lastly, the capabilities of the phishing simulation could be used by any organization that does not have a program in place for phishing.

Incentivized

The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.

Incentivized

• Customized unified design platform
• Modules that fit your organization
• Low technology involvement with information department.
• Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
• Single sign-on web-based applications

Incentivized

• Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
• Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
• Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
• Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
• Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
• Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).

Incentivized

BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.

Incentivized

Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.

Incentivized

BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.

Incentivized

The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.

Incentivized

Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).

Incentivized

• We are finding our employees are much better able to identify malicious emails
• Less time spent on IT developing, delivering, and maintaining security awareness training
• Overall has lead to an increase in Security within the organization

Incentivized

• The system is costly for the initial setup
• Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
• One license for all users
• Easy to manage employee's security access

Incentivized