Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) vs. WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | Score7.1 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | WSO2 says they have taken a fresh look at old-style, centralized ESB architectures, and designed their unique WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus from the ground up as the highest performance, lowest footprint, and most interoperable service oriented architecture (SOA) and integration middleware today. Additionally, the vendor says that by relying on their carbon technology the ESB is able to deliver a smooth start-to-finish project experience. | N/A |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Mule ESB Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() IBM DataPower Gateway Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 6.0 |
| Availability | - | 2.0 |
| Performance | - | 6.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Configurability | - | 5.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |





