Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Twingate
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management. | $2.50 per user/per month |
Twingate | Score9.9 out of 10 | N/A | Twingate allows businesses to secure remote access to their private applications, data, and environments, whether they are on-premise or in the cloud. Built to make the lives of DevOps teams, IT teams, and end users easier, it replaces outdated corporate VPNs which were not built to handle a world in which "work from anywhere" and cloud-based assets are increasingly the norm. Twingate’s modern zero trust-based approach to securing remote access focuses on improving security,… | $0 |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Twingate | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | An Enterprise Plan with customized pricing is also available. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 157 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
99% Delivers good value for the price 146 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
95% Happy with the feature set 155 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 130 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 140 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Twingate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.4 | - |
| Usability | 8.6 | 10.0 |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | 9.5 |
| Implementation Rating | 7.3 | - |
| Configurability | 8.2 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots | Twingate Screenshots |











