Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management vs. Tradogram

It is good for small and medium-size customers. Large customers have unique requirements and D365 somewhere lacking compared to products like SAP SCM. UX is very good. Works well with integration with Microsoft products. Integration with 3rd party products like SAP is not that great. It is easier to learn compared to SAP.

Incentivized

If your business is focused on one specific product or small in scope, Tradogram should be able to suit your needs. If you require simplistic reporting without in depth project codes and details, it does provide basic functionality that is very well suited for small enterprise. Companies that do all of their purchasing with POs will find it to be useful. If you are able to operate without needing it to plug back into a comprehensive ERP system, it should be sufficient.

Incentivized

• Up time and Environments: Environment is always monitored and has a high up time
• Updates: It is continuously updated with new features and bug fixed along with new legislations
• Ita core capabilities are great for both manufacturing and distribution purposes.

Incentivized

• User-friendly
• Helpful and attentive staff
• Dashboard
• Easy import/export
• Customizable workflow
• Project coding capabilities

Incentivized

• Integration with 3rd party solutions.
• Analytics can be better.
• Can have more features for large enterprise like SAP SCM.

Incentivized

• Reporting is really rigid and not customizable (except at an additional fee)
• The API is new and still requires significant work to connect back into our ERP
• Non-PO invoicing is extremely basic and doesn't draw from existing features
• Can take a lot of clicks to get through a task

Incentivized

the flexibility and cloud implementations allow for flexible design of our physical space.Its looks and feels make us easy for onboarding as well as the documentation process for files or product features or configuration settings helps a lot in it. to decide a power platform for business it is best to choose a perfect one as it can change the solution and can impact the business as well.

Incentivized

We evaluated Procurify as part of our initial scope conversations. Ultimately, we felt that the price point was outside of what we could support and went with the lesser cost of Tradogram instead.

Incentivized

• Increase operational efficiency
• Improve strategic planning
• Optimize workforce productivity

Incentivized

• The product was priced very well as we made the transition from a homegrown internal system.
• The need to pay to customize the system to do what we need it to do has been cumbersome.
• The API connection back to our ERP system has not been optimal and has required us to engage with outside parties to assure that it is working properly.

Incentivized