Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise vs. Oracle Database

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016. Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.N/A
Oracle Database
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Database, currently in edition 23ai, is a converged, multimodel database management system. It is designed to simplify development for AI, microservices, graph, document, spatial, and relational applications.
$0.05
per hour
Pricing
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseOracle Database
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Oracle Base Database Service - Standard
$0.0538
per hour
Oracle Base Database Service - Enterprise
$0.1075
per hour
Oracle Base Database Service - High Performance
$0.2218
per hour
Standard Edition
Contact Sales
Enterprise Edition
Contact Sales
Personal Edition
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseOracle Database
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseOracle Database
Features
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseOracle Database
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
3 Ratings
45% below category average
Oracle Database
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources6.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Oracle Database
-
Ratings
Visualization7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
3 Ratings
52% below category average
Oracle Database
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment5.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations5.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
3 Ratings
33% below category average
Oracle Database
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools5.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.5
2 Ratings
27% below category average
Oracle Database
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls6.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
-
Ratings
Oracle Database
8.5
5 Ratings
7% above category average
ACID compliance00 Ratings8.85 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings8.85 Ratings
Database locking00 Ratings8.85 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings9.84 Ratings
Disaster recovery00 Ratings9.34 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings6.25 Ratings
Multiple datatypes00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseOracle Database
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseOracle Database
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(5 ratings)
9.0
(190 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.4
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseOracle Database
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
Read full review
Oracle
We migrated from NoSQL to an Oracle database. One of the reasons was robust backup and recovery options available in the Oracle database, which provide zero data loss. A transactional database like Oracle is a better fit for our use case than NoSQL. On a large scale, deployment was evaluated as a cheaper option than the NoSQL engine. This conclusion came even after considering Oracle license is expensive.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • It allows distributed algorithm runs on Hadoop HDFS cluster
  • It allows using different file formats such as SAS7BAT files or complex files in tab or comma delimited making data munging easier
  • It provides scalable solutions by allowing users to re-use R scripts and distributing the computing over nodes through RHadoop
Read full review
Oracle
  • Supports most of the Operating Systems like Unix, Linux and Windows Server.
  • It works well in high load environment under intense parallel transactions setup.
  • Highly reliable DBMS, especially RAC is very much reliable.
  • Well managed and predictable release of security patches.
  • We have highly scaled it from on-prem to a cloud cluster environment for our product.
  • One of the best-performing DBMSs on Linux machines under test delivers high throughput (QPS).
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Very steep learning curve... for such a quick and useful tool the learning curve is unacceptable.
  • Very dangerous in the wrong hands. Because most add-ons are pre-written, you have to trust the community that malicious script is not used.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The memory demand and management makes it impossible to run it in a container.
  • It is hard to perform local unit testing with Oracle even using the personal edition (aggressive all the available memory grab for itself).
  • Lack of built in database migrations (e.g. as Flyway).
  • The need to install the Oracle client in addition to its drivers.
  • The cost of running it, especially in the Cloud.
  • Comes with very spartan community grade client/management tools whereas the commercial offerings tend to demand a premium price.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
Read full review
Oracle
There is a lot of sunk cost in a product like Oracle 12c. It is doing a great job, it would not provide us much benefit to switch to another product even if it did the same thing due to the work involved in making such a switch. It would not be cost effective.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
Read full review
Oracle
Many of the powerful options can be auto-configured but there are still many things to take into account at the moment of installing and configuring an Oracle Database, compared with SQL Server or other databases. At the same time, that extra complexity allows for detailed configuration and guarantees performance, scalability, availability and security.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
Read full review
Oracle
1. I have very good experience with Oracle Database support team. Oracle support team has pool of talented Oracle Analyst resources in different regions. To name a few regions - EMEA, Asia, USA(EST, MST, PST), Australia. Their support staffs are very supportive, well trained, and customer focused. Whenever I open Oracle Sev1 SR(service request), I always get prompt update on my case timely. 2. Oracle has zoom call and chat session option linked to Oracle SR. Whenever you are in Oracle portal - you can chat with the Oracle Analyst who is working on your case. You can request for Oracle zoom call thru which you can share the your problem server screen in no time. This is very nice as it saves lot of time and energy in case you have to follow up with oracle support for your case. 3.Oracle has excellent knowledge base in which all the customer databases critical problems and their solutions are well documented. It is very easy to follow without consulting to support team at first.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Overall the implementation went very well and after that everything came out as expected - in terms of performance and scalability. People should always install and upgrade a stable version for production with the latest patch set updates, test properly as much as possible, and should have a backup plan if anything unexpected happens
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
Read full review
Oracle
Because of a rich user base and support for any critical issue, this is one of the best options to choose. In case the project has a TCO issue, it can compromise and choose Postgres as the best alternative. SQL server is also good and easy to code and maintain but performance is not as good as the Oracle
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Helped save company money versus buying other stat software
Read full review
Oracle
  • Multiple applications can use the same database and still get high performance
  • Licensing cost is still a concern compared to the other options available in the market that are very very inexpensive
  • Almost a maintenance free database
  • Oracle Grid makes life easy in terms of monitoring and managing the databases
Read full review
ScreenShots