Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016.
Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.
N/A
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Presto is an open source SQL query engine designed to run queries on data stored in Hadoop or in traditional databases.
Teradata supported development of Presto followed the acquisition of Hadapt and Revelytix.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
PrestoDB (or Presto)
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and PrestoDB (or Presto)
Feature
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
3 Ratings
45% below category average
PrestoDB (or Presto)
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
6.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
MDM Integration
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and PrestoDB (or Presto)
Feature
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
3 Ratings
19% below category average
PrestoDB (or Presto)
-
Ratings
Visualization
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and PrestoDB (or Presto)
Feature
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
3 Ratings
52% below category average
PrestoDB (or Presto)
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
5.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Encryption
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and PrestoDB (or Presto)
Feature
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
3 Ratings
34% below category average
PrestoDB (or Presto)
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
5.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and PrestoDB (or Presto)
If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Presto is for interactive simple queries, where Hive is for reliable processing. If you have a fact-dim join, presto is great..however for fact-fact joins presto is not the solution.. Presto is a great replacement for proprietary technology like Vertica
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Linking, embedding links and adding images is easy enough.
Once you have become familiar with the interface, Presto becomes very quick & easy to use (but, you have to practice & repeat to know what you are doing - it is not as intuitive as one would hope).
Organizing & design is fairly simple with click & drag parameters.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Presto was not designed for large fact fact joins. This is by design as presto does not leverage disk and used memory for processing which in turn makes it fast.. However, this is a tradeoff..in an ideal world, people would like to use one system for all their use cases, and presto should get exhaustive by solving this problem.
Resource allocation is not similar to YARN and presto has a priority queue based query resource allocation..so a query that takes long takes longer...this might be alleviated by giving some more control back to the user to define priority/override.
UDF Support is not available in presto. You will have to write your own functions..while this is good for performance, it comes at a huge overhead of building exclusively for presto and not being interoperable with other systems like Hive, SparkSQL etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Presto is good for a templated design appeal. You cannot be too creative via this interface - but, the layout and options make the finalized visual product appealing to customers. The other design products I use are for different purposes and not really comparable to Presto.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info