Microsoft Sentinel vs. Onapsis

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Sentinel (formerly Azure Sentinel) is designed as a birds-eye view across the enterprise. It is presented as a security information and event management (SIEM) solution for proactive threat detection, investigation, and response.
$2.46
per GB ingested
Onapsis
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Onapsis, headquartered in Boston, offers application security software to enterprises in the form of the Onapsis Security Platform for SAP and the Onapsis Security Platform for Oracle E-Business Suite.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft SentinelOnapsis
Editions & Modules
Azure Sentinel
$2.46
per GB ingested
100 GB per day
$123.00
per day
200 GB per day
$221.40
per day
300 GB per day
$319.80
per day
400 GB per day
$410.00
per day
500 GB per day
$492.00
per day
More than 500 GB per day
$492.00 + $98.40
per day/plus each additional 100 GB increment
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft SentinelOnapsis
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SentinelOnapsis
Features
Microsoft SentinelOnapsis
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Sentinel
8.0
30 Ratings
2% above category average
Onapsis
-
Ratings
Centralized event and log data collection8.629 Ratings00 Ratings
Correlation8.330 Ratings00 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management7.930 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment flexibility6.928 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools8.228 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces7.930 Ratings00 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection8.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Data integration/API management7.828 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining7.926 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds8.328 Ratings00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation8.327 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management7.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching8.428 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft SentinelOnapsis
Small Businesses
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 7.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft SentinelOnapsis
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(53 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.5
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SentinelOnapsis
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Specifically for Microsoft Sentinel, it's going to have what's next to no value if you're not on Azure. You have to be in as your customer. If you want greater insight into what is going on in your cloud environment, turn Microsoft Sentinel on, but focus on where you enable it. You're not going to turn it on to see everything because it's not like focus on the areas where you are at risk or you believe you're at risk or something that you're, depending on your environment, do you have multiple subscriptions? Do you have a Microsoft Sentinel subscription that you just turned on, but it's not getting the visibility, and then you can alert on stuff that goes out of trend, etc.?
Read full review
Onapsis
Onapsis is divided into 4 major components,
  1. Assess
  2. Comply
  3. Defend
  4. Control
In assess, it does a whitebox and blackbox testing of the ERP systems that have been added to the Onapsis console. It highlights relevant application issues and automates the process, also provides the solutions to implement the fix. In comply, it provides a governance on the various regulatory compliances which the firm has to follow, as well as provides a firm grip to the audit and ERP admin team. In control, it enables a workflow of 15 pre-defined parameter values within the SAP system and helps monitor, and track the changes made to those parameters. The capabilities are to either block, or request for an approval for changes made to those parameters in addition to just monitoring them. In defend, it goes through the SAP logs; and compares it with a pre-defined ruleset to alert the end-users via email or SIEM tool or both.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Strong integration with the Microsoft security ecosystem allows seamless connection to services such as Microsoft Defender, Microsoft 365, and Azure. This makes it easy to bring together identity, endpoint, and cloud signals to support investigation and detection scenarios.
  • Effective correlation of alerts and incidents in collaboration with Microsoft Defender XDR helps combine related signals into higher‑fidelity incidents. This reduces noise and improves visibility into attack context, making investigations more efficient.
  • High scalability for data ingestion and processing enables large volumes of security telemetry to be handled efficiently.
Read full review
Onapsis
  • Eliminating the manual process improves the overall accuracy of results and also frees up valuable resources to focus on other different projects.
  • Onapsis provides great leverage to our technical teams in order to review in a standardized way of the landscape.
  • Onapsis always matches vulnerabilities with useful context and finds possible solutions.
  • Onapsis is usually implemented to continuously monitor, and alert us on any issues on the SAP systems. Not only this but implementing Onapsis also eliminates the network on the year-end and month-end audits and helps in making the overall process faster, smooth, efficient as well as accurate.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • I think it's primarily going to be cost, since Microsoft Sentinel uses Microsoft Log Analytics as its base, right? So storing the logs and log retention is very expensive. That might result in users not adopting it as quickly. Second, I think Copilot for security can just do summarization and not many remediation tasks. In the future, we would like to see Copilot create many playbooks, including all box playbooks, to remediate many security issues.
Read full review
Onapsis
  • Multiple UIs
  • No proper customization of UI log-off
  • Tedious setup of Control component
  • No proper error messages received
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
it does the job reasonably well
Read full review
Onapsis
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
The Microsoft Azure Sentinel solution is very good and even better if you use Azure. It's easy to implement and learn how to use the tool with an intuitive and simple interface. New updates are happening to always bring new news and improve the experience and usability. The solution brings reliability as it is from a very reliable manufacturer.
Read full review
Onapsis
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Azure Sentinel is very easy to use and configure. If you are stuck somewhere, Microsoft support is excellent in assisting and solving your issue.
Read full review
Onapsis
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Sentinel excels in cloud-native scalability, Microsoft ecosystem integration, and AI-driven threat detection with UEBA and Fusion rules, offering faster deployment and lower costs (48% cheaper per Forrester) than Splunk, QRadar, Exabeam, SentinelOne, Securonix, and Wazuh. It lags in third-party integrations and syslog parsing. Organizations choose Microsoft Sentinel for its cost-effectiveness, automation, and Microsoft synergy, especially in Azure-heavy environments, though Splunk and Exabeam lead in flexibility and UEBA, respectively.
Read full review
Onapsis
Honestly, I havent use something like Onapsis before and currently I am not aware if there is something similiar out there. They are one of a kind and is a complete suit, so is unlikelly that someone from outside will appear with a better solution.
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
Did not use professional services
Read full review
Onapsis
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • As any cybersecurity product, this has to be more with risk to avoid loss in case of a ransomware that more than relate to a productivity increase. Maybe the impact could be that instead of having people that are checking 24/7 the dashboard, you could implement Sentinel and have less people checking that or people with less expertise. So the saving will be a minor but will be a saving in the cost of your team.
Read full review
Onapsis
  • It offers very reasonable packages.
  • The customer support of Onapsis is reliable and efficient.
  • It is a great platform as it shows a unified and easy-to-read different and complex topics in a simpler way.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Sentinel Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Microsoft Sentinel Capabilities