MISP Threat Sharing vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

MISP Threat Sharing

MISP Threat Sharing

1 Reviews and Ratings

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

10 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
MISP Threat Sharing	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	MISP Threat Sharing is an open source software and set of standards to share, create and validate threatintel and intelligence. As an open source project MSP Threat Sharing is free to participate in, and use.	N/A
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	AutoFocus™ contextual threat intelligence service, from Palo Alto Networks, accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.	N/A

Pricing

MISP Threat Sharing

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
MISP Threat Sharing	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	MISP Threat Sharing	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Best Alternatives
	MISP Threat Sharing	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Small Businesses	Egnyte Score 9.5 out of 10	Egnyte Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	MISP Threat Sharing	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (4 ratings)

User Testimonials
	MISP Threat Sharing	Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Likelihood to Recommend	Open Source No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Open Source No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks Threat intelligence Emerging Threats Intelligence feeds Incentivized Randy Varela Security Engineer Read full review
Cons	Open Source No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks third party product integration simplicity of the managment console integration to cortex agents directly Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Open Source No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Open Source No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks Cheap for us Easy integration Easy management Incentivized Randy Varela Security Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots