TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Neo4j vs. Tanzu Data Services (Greenplum, GemFire, RabbitMQ, Tanzu SQL)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Neo4j

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ANeo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.

    $65

    per month

    VMware Tanzu Data Services

    Score6 out of 10
    N/ATanzu Data Services is a family of data-driven solutions built to store, process, and query critical data resources in real-time and at massive scale, both on-premises and in the multi-cloud world.N/A
    Pricing
    Neo4jVMware Tanzu Data Services
    Editions & Modules
    Aura Professional
    $65
    per month
    Community Edition
    Free
    Enterprise Edition
    Contact Sales
    Aura Free
    Free
    Aura Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Neo4jVMware Tanzu Data Services
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Neo4jVMware Tanzu Data Services
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle Exadata
    Score9.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Neo4jVMware Tanzu Data Services
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Neo4jVMware Tanzu Data Services
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Neo Technologies
    Neo4J is great for creating network graphs or illustrating how things are related. It is also good for finding individuals or things that have greater influence than others in a system. It is not appropriate if you have standard data sets that can be analyzed using conventional methods or visualized using Tableau, for example.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    If you need to execute ml algorithms, learning techniques, or mathematical calculations on large amounts of heterogeneous data, VMware Tanzu Data Services will be ideal. It will be really simple to set up, particularly if you choose AWS as your integrated cloud provider. However, if you're working with lower data amounts, such as gigabytes, it can be superfluous.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Neo Technologies
    • Mature Query language, I found Cypher QL to be mature in handling all sorts of problems we throw at it. Its expressive enough to be intuitive while providing rich features for various scenarios.
    • Native support for REST API, that makes interacting with Neo4J intuitive and easy.
    • Support for Procedures in Java, procedures are custom code that could be added to the Neo4J to write custom querying of data. The best part about the procedures is it could be invoked using the REST API. This allows us to overcome any shortcomings from their Cypher query language.
    • Nice UI and interface for executing the Query and visualizing the response.
    • UI access controlled by User credentials allows for neat access controls.
    • Awesome free community edition for small-scale projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • Apache MADlib provides popular machine learning functionality.
    • Allows you to query terabytes of data databases.
    • Interoperability for AWS S3 is effortless.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Neo Technologies
    • One of the hardest challenges that Neo4j had to solve was the horizontal scaling problem. I am not updated on recent developments, but at the time of my use, I couldn't find a viable solution.
    • Neo4j does not play with other open source APIs like Blueprint. You have to use the native Neo4j API.
    • There wasn't a visual tool to see your data. Of course, third party tools are always available, but I would have loved something which came with the Neo4j bundle. I love that Docker comes bundled with Kitematic, so it's not wrong to hope that Neo4j could also ship with some default visualization software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • Running on Azure is a little more difficult.
    • Synchronization with Kafka may be a little easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Neo Technologies
    Learning cypher was super easy coming from a SQL background. Furthermore, the docs Neo4j provides on their website make it really easy to pull up a reference, guide or a quick example. The mac app they provide is also really well designed with good visualisation tools, with the ability to easily use colour, line thickness etc to help navigate your data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Neo Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    They were very helpful. We needed support for initial implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Neo Technologies
    Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join algorithms which are expensive. MongoDB is a great choice when distributed schemaless rich document structures are important requirements. Cross document transaction support is not native to MongoDB yet, whereas Neo4J is ACID complaint with all its operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Neo Technologies
    • Positive: Less complex queries on graph structures, than in relational databases.
    • Negative: maintenance is a huge deal, things doesn't work and break, requiring lengthy restore operations.
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • There was a noticeable reduction in system reliability.
    • Saw a reduction in unsuccessful analytics operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots