LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester vs. PingPlotter
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | The LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester offers user-configured AutoTests for a wide range of tasks. This network tester’s cable test and switch identification facilitate problem isolation. The device is supported by netAlly after NETSCOUT divested its handheld troubleshooting devices in 2018. The LinkRunner device replaces the former and now obsolete OneTouch AT network troubleshooting technology acquired from Seattle-based Fluke Networks by NETSCOUT in 2015. | N/A |
PingPlotter | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | PingPlotter is a graphical traceroute and ping tool that visualizes network performance in a way that makes identifying the source of problems quicker and easier for everyone from online gamers and video streamers to VoIP admins and IT pros. Features for remote deployment, network monitoring, scripting, and a web interface are included along with several additional capabilities. | $0 per user |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | PingPlotter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 33 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 33 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 21 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 31 Answers | |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | PingPlotter | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Cisco Catalyst Assurance Score8.1 out of 10 | Paessler PRTG Score8.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Cisco Catalyst Assurance Score8.1 out of 10 | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | PingPlotter Screenshots |






