TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ANetApp's FAS series systems offers a storage array system for enterprises.N/A

    TrueContext

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ATrueContext (formerly ProntoForms) provides an enterprise-level low-code field-focused application. The solution is used to create apps and forms to collect and analyze field data with smartphones and tablets – either as a standalone solution or as a mobile front-end to enterprise systems of record.

    $25

    per month per license (billed annually)

    Pricing
    NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Essentials
    $25
    per month per license (billed annually)
    Advanced
    $45
    per month per license (billed annually)
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Volume discounts available
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
    Considered Both Products
    NetApp
    No answer on this topic
    TrueContext Corporation
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    80%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
    Survey Format & Appearance
    Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of NetApp FAS Storage Arrays and TrueContext
    Feature
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    -
    Ratings
    TrueContext
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Custom logo/branding00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Survey Content
    Comparison of Survey Content features of NetApp FAS Storage Arrays and TrueContext
    Feature
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    -
    Ratings
    TrueContext
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Changes to live survey00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Question design help00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Multiple question types00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Survey Logic
    Comparison of Survey Logic features of NetApp FAS Storage Arrays and TrueContext
    Feature
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    -
    Ratings
    TrueContext
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Survey logic flexibility00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Survey Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of NetApp FAS Storage Arrays and TrueContext
    Feature
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    -
    Ratings
    TrueContext
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Response tracking00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Data export00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Analytics00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Survey Administration & Security
    Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of NetApp FAS Storage Arrays and TrueContext
    Feature
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    -
    Ratings
    TrueContext
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Access controls00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Compliance00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Survey Distribution
    Comparison of Survey Distribution features of NetApp FAS Storage Arrays and TrueContext
    Feature
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    -
    Ratings
    TrueContext
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Respondent restrictions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Jotform
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Qualaroo
    Score7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Score7.3 out of 10
    QuestionPro
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
    Likelihood to Recommend
    NetApp
    It is very easy to use with NFS. Creating new volumes and mounting to servers such as ESXi or Linux is a breeze. It does also support CIFS but it is far less intuitive and requires much more effort. Replicated data is also very simple and robust in the form of SnapVaults or SnapMirrors. This data is either immediately or periodically replicated to a peer FAS in the cluster for retention.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    Prontoforms is suited for complicated business needs that are able to integrate seamlessly into one of the out-of-the-box solutions available. For simple recording to a spreadsheet, pdf, word document, database, etc. without any additional integrations, better (and in some cases free) solutions may work. For custom integrations, cost and effort may get expensive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    NetApp
    • The selling point for NetApp FAS is the application and data protection integration capabilities they provide.
    • We have been able to use NetApp FAS in a variety of use cases with a standard set of management tools.
    • NetApp FAS has evolved over the years from just NAS to also include block protocols. At this time they support almost all industry standard protocols.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    • Conditional logic
    • Linking to data sources
    • Integration to Salesforce and ServiceMax
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    NetApp
    • Deduplication job runs at certain times and creates a large CPU overhead for the system
    • Management of a volumes, disk groups, LUNs, etc. is a burden to manage and is not efficient with storage capacity
    • Upgrades are complicated and not "non-disruptive"
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    • Limitations to form formatting
    • Need more data source integrations
    • All of the different components need to synchronize automatically and more often.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    NetApp
    It just works! We've used NetApp FAS Storage Arrays systems since 2011 and have had fantastic results, in particular since 2016 as performance has drastically improved. Tools are great/user friendly, command line capabilities are very strong ... it is simply very effective at what it does!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    NetApp
    It does have a really nice and easy to use web interface to do pretty much anything you need with it. It was very simple to configure our volumes and luns and connect them to our VMWare environment using the interface. It has options to rename, shrink, grow, and other things with our luns and volumes. It was nice and easy to read graphs to see where you stand on your storage usage at a glance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    As Prontoforms markets itself as a low code, user-friendly drag and drop solution, it definitely excels in the area of user experience. While those who are more on the technical side will appreciate the standard options available as part of its custom integration tools. The learning curve has never been an issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    NetApp
    NetApp support in Brazil is managed by its partners. We know in other countries, such as the US and NO, they have support directly from Netapp. We have a very good NetApp partner working with us since the beginning, on both the implementation and daily support. Very few cases needed to be escalated to NetApp support, most of the cases are handled and satisfyingly closed by the partner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    The customer support for pronto forms was great for me in the only instance that I have had to use it. I called the phone number for ProntoForms customer support, they were quick with the correct answer for me and very reassuring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    NetApp
    Our initial deployment was handled by pro services. Most later deployments were handled in-house. All went very smoothly. Documentation made it relatively easy to set up new systems which allowed us to do it in-house. When using pro services they were professional and comprehensive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    NetApp
    NetApp stacked nicely and gave enterprise-level usability for snapshot-based backups. Our previous RPO was several hours. It was selected prior to me arriving at the company, but It was selected for the hardware refreshes due to its compatibility with several other vendors, like CommVault and VMware.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    We looked for versatility of product and cost effectiveness when trying to choose vendors. Even though the product can be set up by the user or administrator, the more complex parts of the form required help to be done right. Vendors needed to be able to offer their services to get this done in a timely fashion. ProntoForms hit all the marks. We looked at other vendors and they just couldn't replicate or form closely enough.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    NetApp
    • The speed of file recovery is the biggest positive impact. Recovering from a ransomware attack in minutes is something you can certainly brag about.
    • Integration with products like Exchange and SQL can certainly speed up normal day to day processes. Not just in backup recovery situations either.
    • Redundant paths make migrations and updates very easy with no downtime.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TrueContext Corporation
    • Return on Investment is immediate and possible from the first submission.
    • Saved us hours when it came to implementing forms on websites
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    TrueContext Screenshots

    Screenshot of task automationScreenshot of field operations tracking and measurementScreenshot of available integrations