NetApp FAS Storage Arrays vs. TrueContext

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
NetApp's FAS series systems offers a storage array system for enterprises.N/A
TrueContext
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
TrueContext (formerly ProntoForms) provides an enterprise-level low-code field-focused application. The solution is used to create apps and forms to collect and analyze field data with smartphones and tablets – either as a standalone solution or as a mobile front-end to enterprise systems of record.
$25
per month per license (billed annually)
Pricing
NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$25
per month per license (billed annually)
Advanced
$45
per month per license (billed annually)
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Volume discounts available
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
Features
NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Custom logo/branding00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Changes to live survey00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Question design help00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Multiple question types00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Survey logic flexibility00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Response tracking00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Data export00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Analytics00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Access controls00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Compliance00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Respondent restrictions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.2 out of 10
Verint Voice of the Customer
Verint Voice of the Customer
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(15 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(4 ratings)
8.7
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NetApp FAS Storage ArraysTrueContext
Likelihood to Recommend
NetApp
It is very easy to use with NFS. Creating new volumes and mounting to servers such as ESXi or Linux is a breeze. It does also support CIFS but it is far less intuitive and requires much more effort. Replicated data is also very simple and robust in the form of SnapVaults or SnapMirrors. This data is either immediately or periodically replicated to a peer FAS in the cluster for retention.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
Prontoforms is suited for complicated business needs that are able to integrate seamlessly into one of the out-of-the-box solutions available. For simple recording to a spreadsheet, pdf, word document, database, etc. without any additional integrations, better (and in some cases free) solutions may work. For custom integrations, cost and effort may get expensive.
Read full review
Pros
NetApp
  • The selling point for NetApp FAS is the application and data protection integration capabilities they provide.
  • We have been able to use NetApp FAS in a variety of use cases with a standard set of management tools.
  • NetApp FAS has evolved over the years from just NAS to also include block protocols. At this time they support almost all industry standard protocols.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
  • Conditional logic
  • Linking to data sources
  • Integration to Salesforce and ServiceMax
Read full review
Cons
NetApp
  • Deduplication job runs at certain times and creates a large CPU overhead for the system
  • Management of a volumes, disk groups, LUNs, etc. is a burden to manage and is not efficient with storage capacity
  • Upgrades are complicated and not "non-disruptive"
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
  • Limitations to form formatting
  • Need more data source integrations
  • All of the different components need to synchronize automatically and more often.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
NetApp
It just works! We've used NetApp FAS Storage Arrays systems since 2011 and have had fantastic results, in particular since 2016 as performance has drastically improved. Tools are great/user friendly, command line capabilities are very strong ... it is simply very effective at what it does!
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
No answers on this topic
Usability
NetApp
It does have a really nice and easy to use web interface to do pretty much anything you need with it. It was very simple to configure our volumes and luns and connect them to our VMWare environment using the interface. It has options to rename, shrink, grow, and other things with our luns and volumes. It was nice and easy to read graphs to see where you stand on your storage usage at a glance.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
As Prontoforms markets itself as a low code, user-friendly drag and drop solution, it definitely excels in the area of user experience. While those who are more on the technical side will appreciate the standard options available as part of its custom integration tools. The learning curve has never been an issue.
Read full review
Support Rating
NetApp
NetApp support in Brazil is managed by its partners. We know in other countries, such as the US and NO, they have support directly from Netapp. We have a very good NetApp partner working with us since the beginning, on both the implementation and daily support. Very few cases needed to be escalated to NetApp support, most of the cases are handled and satisfyingly closed by the partner.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
The customer support for pronto forms was great for me in the only instance that I have had to use it. I called the phone number for ProntoForms customer support, they were quick with the correct answer for me and very reassuring.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
NetApp
Our initial deployment was handled by pro services. Most later deployments were handled in-house. All went very smoothly. Documentation made it relatively easy to set up new systems which allowed us to do it in-house. When using pro services they were professional and comprehensive.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
NetApp
NetApp stacked nicely and gave enterprise-level usability for snapshot-based backups. Our previous RPO was several hours. It was selected prior to me arriving at the company, but It was selected for the hardware refreshes due to its compatibility with several other vendors, like CommVault and VMware.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
We looked for versatility of product and cost effectiveness when trying to choose vendors. Even though the product can be set up by the user or administrator, the more complex parts of the form required help to be done right. Vendors needed to be able to offer their services to get this done in a timely fashion. ProntoForms hit all the marks. We looked at other vendors and they just couldn't replicate or form closely enough.
Read full review
Return on Investment
NetApp
  • The speed of file recovery is the biggest positive impact. Recovering from a ransomware attack in minutes is something you can certainly brag about.
  • Integration with products like Exchange and SQL can certainly speed up normal day to day processes. Not just in backup recovery situations either.
  • Redundant paths make migrations and updates very easy with no downtime.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
  • Return on Investment is immediate and possible from the first submission.
  • Saved us hours when it came to implementing forms on websites
Read full review
ScreenShots

TrueContext Screenshots

Screenshot of task automationScreenshot of field operations tracking and measurementScreenshot of available integrations