Netskope Private Access vs. Zscaler Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netskope Private Access
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
Zscaler Private Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Private Access™ (ZPA) gives users secure access to private apps and OT devices while enabling zero trust connectivity for workloads.N/A
Pricing
Netskope Private AccessZscaler Private Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netskope Private AccessZscaler Private Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Netskope Private AccessZscaler Private Access
Considered Both Products
Netskope Private Access
Chose Netskope Private Access
In comparison to Zscaler Private Access, Netskope Private Access provides more features and stability to the user environment. Netskope private access improves user experience in comparison to Zscaler Private Access. Cost-wise, Zscaler is cheaper than Netskope private access. …
Zscaler Private Access

No answer on this topic

Features
Netskope Private AccessZscaler Private Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
10.0
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Zscaler Private Access
9.1
10 Ratings
2% above category average
Multi-Factor Authentication10.02 Ratings9.110 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
7.5
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Zscaler Private Access
9.0
6 Ratings
1% below category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)7.53 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
6.8
4 Ratings
13% below category average
Zscaler Private Access
8.5
11 Ratings
9% above category average
Network Analytics7.04 Ratings8.811 Ratings
Threat Recognition7.04 Ratings8.99 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification7.04 Ratings8.97 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting7.74 Ratings8.110 Ratings
Threat Analysis6.04 Ratings8.67 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting6.74 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification6.34 Ratings8.59 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
7.8
4 Ratings
11% below category average
Zscaler Private Access
9.1
11 Ratings
4% above category average
Continuous Verification8.04 Ratings8.911 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways8.04 Ratings9.211 Ratings
Network Flow Control7.34 Ratings9.110 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis9.04 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging6.74 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Admin Access Control9.04 Ratings9.19 Ratings
Network Data Encryption7.34 Ratings9.211 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping7.03 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Netskope Private AccessZscaler Private Access
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Netskope Private AccessZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(3 ratings)
9.1
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(10 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netskope Private AccessZscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Netskope
For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
Read full review
Zscaler
Zscaler Private Access works really well in environments setup for FQDNs and where you know what users should/shouldn't be accessing on what ports. You can use Zscaler Private Access to figure out these kinds of features but that doesn't always mean you'll be correct. It also provides a consistent experience for users as they can access their materials anywhere. It also makes the user the last line of defense. If a user's account is compromised then the attacker has access to everything they already did. It doesn't work great in OT environments or Server based environments. Flows have to be initiated from the client and not the server for stuff to behave properly.
Read full review
Pros
Netskope
  • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
  • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
  • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Allows strong cyber security corporate policies
  • Very reliable VPN application that operates at 100% efficiency
  • Very easy to be configured with friendly user interface
Read full review
Cons
Netskope
  • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Granularity and Complexity of Policy Enforcement
  • Application Segmentation and Listener Configuration - The way applications are defined and listened for is fundamental to ZPA, but can be a source of frustration, especially when dealing with legacy or non-HTTP protocols
  • The ZCC is the user's primary gateway, but its control over local system network behavior can sometimes clash with enterprise requirements.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Netskope
We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Usability
Netskope
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
Read full review
Zscaler
The environment feels more secure, and we are seeing that users are adapting to it fast. The fact that we have tools to assist the users with their day-to-day access helps, as we can hand it off to the helpdesk without any escalations to the Network team. It is a work in progress for our agency, but we are seeing the benefits from the solution.
Read full review
Support Rating
Netskope
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Netskope
The process was smooth and well managed.
There was probably good technical coordination and support.
There were only minor details that could be improved.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Netskope
Read full review
Zscaler
Well ZPA is a good solution, however everyone has their own advantage and disadvantages, with ZPA you can deploy ZTNA model, which will help you better control on access, however Palo Alto, Fortinet they are also market leading firewall solution, and you can not deny if they are not providing the same features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Netskope
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Positive: We have now charged users internally for the service
  • Negative: Dealing with users who also have the Zscaler Client Connector for their company, can cause confusions
  • Negative: Enabling the Zscaler Internet Access entitlement has been a major headache for us because Zscaler Private Access users can't autheniticate through ZIA on a non corporate device.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zscaler Private Access Screenshots

Screenshot of how ZPA provides access for all users while minimizing the attack surface, eliminating lateral movement, and stopping zero day threats. A cloud native service, ZPA can be deployed in just hours to replace legacy remote access tools like VPNs and VDIs.