NGINX vs. SUSE Rancher
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
SUSE Rancher | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Developed by Rancher Labs and now from SUSE, Rancher is open-source software that enables organizations to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale, on any infrastructure across the data center, cloud, branch offices, and the network edge. Rancher centrally manages Kubernetes clusters across the organization in order to ensure security and accelerate transformation. Rancher is also available hosted. Hosted Rancher is a fully managed Rancher control plane - presented as the fastest, most cost… | $7,594.99 per year up to 500 nodes |
| NGINX | SUSE Rancher | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | 100% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 16 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| NGINX | SUSE Rancher | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Container Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | Kubernetes Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 6.8 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| NGINX | SUSE Rancher | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |












