NGINX vs. WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | Score7.1 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | WSO2 says they have taken a fresh look at old-style, centralized ESB architectures, and designed their unique WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus from the ground up as the highest performance, lowest footprint, and most interoperable service oriented architecture (SOA) and integration middleware today. Additionally, the vendor says that by relying on their carbon technology the ESB is able to deliver a smooth start-to-finish project experience. | N/A |
| NGINX | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| NGINX | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Mule ESB Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | ![]() IBM DataPower Gateway Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 7.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | 6.0 |
| Availability | - | 2.0 |
| Performance | - | 6.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Configurability | - | 5.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| NGINX | WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |














