NirvaShare vs. Progress ShareFile
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NirvaShare | N/A | N/A | Enterprise Secure File Sharing of Cloud Storage such as AWS S3, Azure, Wasabi, Digital Ocean Space, MinIO, and Linode. Securely share and collaborate any folder or file with external identities such as customers, partners, vendors, etc with security and fine access control including internal identities like employees. Supports variety of authentication options such as Federated SSO (SAML2), Basic, Form and OTP based. Integrates with identity providers like GSuite, Active Directory,… | N/A |
Progress ShareFile | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Progress ShareFile is a secure File Sharing platform that combines client portals, document requests, workflow automation, approvals, e-signature, and governed document storage. It is designed for organizations that exchange sensitive documents with external clients and need to manage the work surrounding those documents in the same workspace. | $54.45 per month 3 users (minimum) |
| NirvaShare | Progress ShareFile | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing starts as low as $50/month and varies based on the complexity and size, please contact us for more details. | Discount available for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NirvaShare | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 60 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Delivers good value for the price 41 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Happy with the feature set 60 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 40 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | |
| NirvaShare | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | FileZilla Score9.2 out of 10 | Egnyte Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | FileZilla Score9.2 out of 10 | Egnyte Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | FileZilla Score9.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NirvaShare | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 8.8 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 1.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 6.6 |
| Ease of integration | - | 1.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 1.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 9.1 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 9.1 |
| NirvaShare | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | NirvaShare Screenshots | Progress ShareFile Screenshots |















