TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OctoPerf vs. OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs. QAbase

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OctoPerf

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOctoPerf is an enterprise-grade performance and load testing platform available both as SaaS and on-premise, designed for engineering teams working on modern, distributed applications. It enables teams to simulate realistic user traffic, identify performance bottlenecks, and validate application scalability through scalable load test execution. By combining advanced load modeling, deep performance analytics, and flexible deployment options, OctoPerf supports a wide…

    $69

    per month

    LoadRunner Professional

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AA solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A

    QAbase

    N/AN/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    OctoPerfLoadRunner ProfessionalQAbase
    Editions & Modules
    Basic
    $149
    per month
    Pro
    $649
    per month
    Free
    Free
    On Demand
    Contact sales team
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OctoPerfLoadRunner ProfessionalQAbase
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsBoth pay-per-test and subscriptions are available.——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OctoPerfLoadRunner ProfessionalQAbase
    Considered Multiple Products
    OctoPerf
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    Chose LoadRunner Professional
    Most of the above tools are pretty popular in the industry. These are tools that are way cheaper compared to the industry giant LoadRunner. Yet these tools have their own limitations and drawbacks. In BlazeMeter the user load cannot be modified during the test run. JMeter and Bl…
    Incentivized
    QAbase
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    OctoPerfLoadRunner ProfessionalQAbase
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of OctoPerf and OpenText LoadRunner Professional and QAbase
    Feature
    OctoPerf
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    10% above category average
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    1% below category average
    QAbase
    -
    Ratings
    End to end performance management10.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated performance data9.01 Ratings10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility9.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real time monitoring9.01 Ratings6.15 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection10.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OctoPerfLoadRunner ProfessionalQAbase
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OctoPerfLoadRunner ProfessionalQAbase
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OctoPerfLoadRunner ProfessionalQAbase
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OctoPerf
    We used OctoPerf on Continuous Integrations and Continuous Deployment as part of load testing because it is very easy to load data on various frameworks and a wide range of validations can be done virtually. We can also design bespoke graphics and reports to aid in the validation of testing scenarios.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAbase
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    OctoPerf
    • Infrastructure for the cloud that is automated.
    • We have the ability to build real-time reports and dashboards.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
    • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
    • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAbase
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    OctoPerf
    • The version of the runtime needs be upgraded.
    • Additional features should be included.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
    • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
    • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
    • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAbase
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    OctoPerf
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAbase
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OctoPerf
    Unravel Data is a cloud optimization tool, whereas OctoPerf can be used to easily run load test cases and scenarios, as well as develop automated cloud infrastructure to generate customized reports on the test cases run. For the greatest possible user experience, we have some additional functionality such as Jmeter and other legacy tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAbase
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OctoPerf
    • There is no need to know how to code.
    • Reports made to order.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
    • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    QAbase
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    OctoPerf Screenshots

    Screenshot of the scripting studio in OctoPerf - no code neededScreenshot of the runtime part of the application. Here you can select multiple injection locations and run several scenarios in a single testScreenshot of live reporting with numerous metrics. The report is completely dynamics.