OctoPerf vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OctoPerf
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OctoPerf is a load testing tool that is designed to use JMeter in an optimum way. The tool can be used to stress test websites, web apps or mobile apps. The solution enables users to design realistic virtual users without writing a single line of code.
$149
per month
Tricentis NeoLoad
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.
$20,000
per year with 300 virtual users
Pricing
OctoPerfTricentis NeoLoad
Editions & Modules
Basic
$149
per month
Pro
$649
per month
Free
Free
On Demand
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OctoPerfTricentis NeoLoad
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsBoth pay-per-test and subscriptions are available.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OctoPerfTricentis NeoLoad
Considered Both Products
OctoPerf

No answer on this topic

Tricentis NeoLoad
Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
Not use but for my customer, integration with tosca and qtest
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
OctoPerfTricentis NeoLoad
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
OctoPerf
9.4
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Tricentis NeoLoad
-
Ratings
End to end performance management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated performance data9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Real time monitoring9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OctoPerfTricentis NeoLoad
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OctoPerfTricentis NeoLoad
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(31 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OctoPerfTricentis NeoLoad
Likelihood to Recommend
OctoPerf
We used OctoPerf on Continuous Integrations and Continuous Deployment as part of load testing because it is very easy to load data on various frameworks and a wide range of validations can be done virtually. We can also design bespoke graphics and reports to aid in the validation of testing scenarios.
Read full review
Tricentis
While Tricentis NeoLoad supports SAP GUI protocols, recording and maintaining test scripts for complex SAP transactions (like those in the OTC module) can be cumbersome.


For instance, we had challenges recording a VA01 (Sales Order Creation) transaction because of the dynamic nature of SAP screen fields and session handling. NeoLoad sometimes struggles to properly correlate or handle SAP’s SAPGUI Dynpro fields automatically.
Read full review
Pros
OctoPerf
  • Infrastructure for the cloud that is automated.
  • We have the ability to build real-time reports and dashboards.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • With Tricentis NeoLoad, we have control on the test dynamically. One can alter user count/volume even when test is in progress. This makes it a very cool tool as you can avoid running multiple tests eventually saves a lot of time.
  • Tricentis NeoLoad user paths are very well structured. End points can be identified and tweaked easily especially when a large list of endpoints are part of the neoload project.
  • Tricentis NeoLoad results comparison is one of the cool options. We can compare previous tests against the current one to see the exact delta between transaction metrics. This helps in gauging the application behaviour with changes deployed
Read full review
Cons
OctoPerf
  • The version of the runtime needs be upgraded.
  • Additional features should be included.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Ease of use: Some users find certain features or aspects of the interface to be confusing or hard to use. Improving the overall usability of the tool could make it more accessible and easier for users to get up and running with it.
  • Integration with other tools: Tricentis NeoLoad does not have many integrations with other tools. Adding more integrations with popular tools and platforms could make it easier for users to work with Tricentis NeoLoad as part of their overall workflow.
  • Mobile testing: Some users wish that Tricentis NeoLoad had more robust support for testing the performance of mobile applications. This could include the ability to simulate different mobile devices and networks, as well as the ability to test the performance of native mobile apps.
  • Cloud support: Tricentis NeoLoad does not have as much support for cloud-based applications and infrastructure. Adding more support for testing the performance of applications hosted in the cloud could be a useful feature for some users.
  • Advanced scripting capabilities: While Tricentis NeoLoad does offer some scripting capabilities, it would be nice to have more advanced options for customizing and automating load testing scenarios. Adding more advanced scripting capabilities could make it easier for users to create complex load testing scenarios.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OctoPerf
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
We find NeoLoad easy to use compared to their competitors. It requires minimal coding knowledge, also it is easy to train newcomers with NeoLoad. It also offers good integration and automation capability where with less code you can automate your testing process
Read full review
Usability
OctoPerf
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
In being flexible to meet all needs, it is very bare bones by design, but this could be a considered a feature and not a bug.
Read full review
Support Rating
OctoPerf
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
This is the only area where we strongly feel Tricentis needs to improve. Their support process is inadequate, representatives are not so capable of providing solutions at one shot without consulting their internal engineering teams. Most importantly, the time they take to resolve simple issues is huge and at many times hampered our work.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OctoPerf
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
  1. Their documentation is scattered over many places like GitHub read me files, their internal website etc;
  2. Support team takes huge time just to acknowledge our ticket
  3. No support to automatically migrate scripts from competetor tool into
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OctoPerf
Unravel Data is a cloud optimization tool, whereas OctoPerf can be used to easily run load test cases and scenarios, as well as develop automated cloud infrastructure to generate customized reports on the test cases run. For the greatest possible user experience, we have some additional functionality such as Jmeter and other legacy tools.
Read full review
Tricentis
When we used Apache JMeter we faced some problems like less documentation is available for integrating tools, and some integrations have not yet been deployed. Very few plugin updates are made. Since customer support is an open source tool, it is a major problem. While Tricentis Neoload provides better documentations and customer services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OctoPerf
  • There is no need to know how to code.
  • Reports made to order.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Performance testing is like an insurance. An online store which is not available causes a loss of sales. Without a performance test you do not know if it might happen. The invest into performance tests reduces the risk of loosing sales. The flexible license model of NeoLoad allows or customers to choose reasonable and suiteable rate.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OctoPerf Screenshots

Screenshot of Jellly is a full SaaS solution, from virtual user design, to test analysis. No installation is required, no need to write code. You can get performance metrics within a few minutes.Screenshot of Spend less time messing with IT management. We take care of spinning up machines around the world for your needs. This means more time for testing.Screenshot of Get insightful and comprehensive reports even while your test is running. Customize it to give stakeholders all required information to make the final decision.Screenshot of Jellly offers a friendly user interface that will help you create powerful and realistic load tests in a few minutes.

Tricentis NeoLoad Screenshots

Screenshot of Code-less design — loops, conditions, and other drag and drop controls simplify test design creation, and JavaScript can still be used for extremely advanced cases.Screenshot of CI/CD integrations — collaborate across dev, QA, operations, and business teams to create a standardized performance testing approach throughout the enterprise.Screenshot of Real-time test results — analyze test results live to react to an anomaly before the test is over. And leverage in-depth test reporting when the test is completed.Screenshot of Collaborate on test result as the test is runningScreenshot of Configure SaaS-based performance testScreenshot of Dashboard for team analysis