Omnissa Intelligence (formerly Workspace ONE Intelligence for Consumer Apps, or Apteligent Crittercism) is a Mobile APM and crash reporting tool. Its optimization for mobile environments allows it to handle the variety of configurations that come with mobile spaces, and can differentiate issues between applications and specific device environments (Android phone vs. iPhone vs. iPad, etc.). It automates issue detection and reporting, including how network issues impact application functionality…
N/A
TrackJS
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
TrackJS is an error monitoring service for web applications. It provides enhanced stack traces and detailed telemetry for developers to understand how an error happened, how to recreate it, and how to fix it.
N/A
Pricing
Omnissa Intelligence
TrackJS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Omnissa Intelligence
TrackJS
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$49 monthly page views
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Omnissa Intelligence
TrackJS
Considered Both Products
Omnissa Intelligence
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Omnissa Intelligence
I use both for different purposes. Twitter Fabric integration was easier for setup purposes and documentation was a lot clearer than Crittercism and geared towards Swift more so than Objective-C. Twitter Fabric is also better with real-time emails pointing to exact line number …
A similar product we use is Conviva. I personally prefer Crittercism as Conviva seems to miss things fairly often. Critter tends to catch most issues as long as development has set the app up for it. I've had to reproduce issues several times before Conviva catches it whereas …
Crittercism is definitely, in my opinion, best for software testers/engineers. We are the faces behind proper app behavior. However, I'm sure there are other scenarios that would benefit from this program. Engineers should should use it prior to sending out builds to see if anything major is crashing or going wrong behind the scenes to diagnose the problem before going into testing/production
If you're not currently doing any JS error tracking or are just getting started, TrackJS is a great solution. If you are looking for a more technical solution, something like NewRelic may be more appropriate - but if the primary user isn't going to be a web developer and you're looking for something that is easier to use, I would recommend TrackJS.
I use both for different purposes. Twitter Fabric integration was easier for setup purposes and documentation was a lot clearer than Crittercism and geared towards Swift more so than Objective-C. Twitter Fabric is also better with real-time emails pointing to exact line number for a bug. Crittercism is better for bread crumb trails and stack traces to see the user flow and how a problem ending up becoming a problem in the first place.