Red Hat OpenShift vs. Oracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.
$0.08
per hour
Oracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Score 3.7 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC) is a unified platform for real-time data replication, data transformation, data quality, and data governance. DIPC helps migrate and extract value from data by bringing together capabilities of a complete Data Integration, Data Quality and Data Governance solution into a single unified cloud based platform. It can be used to move, transform, cleanse, integrate, replicate, analyze, and govern data.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat OpenShiftOracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat OpenShiftOracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat OpenShiftOracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Red Hat OpenShiftOracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat OpenShift
7.9
90 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces8.274 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability8.790 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead7.382 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability7.573 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control8.484 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration7.876 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation8.082 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication8.077 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification7.780 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery7.979 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes7.883 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShiftOracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Small Businesses
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat OpenShiftOracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(99 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.9
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.4
(19 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat OpenShiftOracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC)
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
Well, in our case, because I have two use cases, one is with the operator, which obviously is super easy with OpenShift because it's just click, click start aside from the issue from the operator. But that's a different interview. And the other point is for the web portal that our portal team uses, it's very easy. Two perform a task needed for them to do their deployment, their pipelines, and their daily Java.
Read full review
Oracle
For daily transactional information and customer data needs it has been an extremely fast and reliable system. Several thousand users are able to connect many third party tools and run a large number of extracts while still experiencing great performance. For smaller systems in use with limited user accounts this system is less appropriate due to maintenance resources required.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • Scales very well.
  • It provides you with a landing pad to modernize what you have in a phased approach so you don't have to do it all at once, right? You can take small pieces of work and implement those on OpenShift over time. It enables us to be able to implement things like GI ops configuration as a service, and infrastructure as a service using the tools that are native to OpenShift, which gives us far greater reliability and consistency as far as monitoring for any kind of drift and configuration or unauthorized changes. So it pretty much gives us a lot of visibility on things that are otherwise relatively difficult to see using the old means of doing what we do. So it provides us with a modern set of tools to accomplish all those objectives.
Read full review
Oracle
  • ODI uses ELT architecture, which enhances the load performance and is very scalable.
  • ODI is platform independent. It supports all platforms, hardware and operating systems.
  • It comes with pre-built integration, allowing immediate data replication, transformation, and data governance while ensuring data quality.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Network of observability, so having one single screen to see to have some network-related metrics for the pod levels. Also at the cluster itself level and more importantly is ease of use for troubleshooting when there's any timeout. This has been the single kind of issue I've been facing for my three years of experience with OpenShift and it hasn't been an easy task for such troubleshooting.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Training and ramping up to learn all the Oracle specific intricacies.
  • Security concerns with administering some of the tools to end users.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
Leverage OpenShift Online constantly at both the free and paid tiers. While AWS is convenient, it often brings more administration than I want to deal with for a quick application (i.e. Drupal or Wordpress blog). OpenShift also simplifies the DNS registration and ability to share application environments with team members
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
Red Hat
As I said before, the obserability is one of the weakest point of OpenShift and that has a lot to do with usability. The Kibana console is not fully integrated with OpenShift console and you have to switch from tab to tab to use it. Same with Prometheus, Jaeger and Grafan, it's a "simple" integration but if you want to do complex queries or dashboards you have to go to the specific console
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Performance
Red Hat
Applications deployed to OpenShift clusters stay responsive when peak load hits or when the traffic dies down - since the platform reacts by scaling out or scaling in the deployed applications elastically - achieved through' policy sense and response automation - leveraging monitoring, measuring (metrics), auto-scaling to meet SLAs, SLOs, and SLIs. This approach works for stateless or stateful business logic hosting applications. The deployed applications perform consistently, stably, and securely across many deployment platforms - public clouds, private data centers, at the edge, or on factory floors - hosted by bare metal or virtual environments.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
Their customer support team is good and quick to respond. On a couple of occassions, they have helped us in solving some issues which we were finding a tad difficult to comprehend. On a rare occasion, the response was a bit slow but maybe it was because of the festival season. Overall a good experience on this front.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
We had some existing apps and were looking for a platform to modernize our app deployments and scale for future growth. Based on Kubernetes, OpenShift offers more flexibility and customization. We could deploy any type of containerized application, not just Cloud Foundry-specific ones. I particularly liked the built-in security and its focus on rapid and automated deployments. Moreover, our cloud strategy isn't set in stone. OpenShift's flexibility means we could deploy on-prem, in multiple public clouds, or use a hybrid approach - something other products couldn't offer as expected.
Read full review
Oracle
We are longtime ODI on-premise users. So, it was easy for us to migrate to the ODI cloud rather than implementing another solution.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Red Hat
It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • I'll say a lot of positive impact because when we started making this product aware to all the application domains in our business, they saw how easy to use. I mean we are giving a lot of control to the development team, how they can scale their application, how can they check the health of the application, and what action they can take if they are in any kind of failure or even meeting the business's SLA. So there are a lot of capabilities and those are really new features they can use. Those I think are a good use of OpenShift.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Ability to setup reliable disaster recovery.
  • Upgrades and performance monitoring tools are readily available.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Data Integration Platform Cloud (DIPC) Screenshots

Screenshot of Data Integration Platform Cloud Control PanelScreenshot of http://media.wiley.com/assets/7327/27/9781119263289_Cloud_Integration_and_API_Management_FD_Oracle_Special_Edition.pdf