TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText ALM Octane vs. OpenText Service Manager

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText ALM Octane

    Score6.4 out of 10
    N/AOpenText™ ALM Octane, formerly from Micro Focus, includes integrated planning, continuous integration, test management, and release management. With these capabilities, it helps Agile teams and DevOps toolchains to deliver high-quality software with insight, traceability, analytics-focused end-to-end visibility, and continuous quality.N/A

    OpenText Service Manager

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText™ Service Manager (formerly from Micro Focus) is scalable service desk software powered by machine learning, analytics, and automation. It provides an ITSM platform for standardizing service delivery and support across the enterprise.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText ALM OctaneOpenText Service Manager
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText ALM OctaneOpenText Service Manager
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OpenText ALM OctaneOpenText Service Manager
    Incident and problem management
    Comparison of Incident and problem management features of OpenText ALM Octane and OpenText Service Manager
    Feature
    OpenText ALM Octane
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Service Manager
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
    Expert directory00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
    Service restoration00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
    Self-service tools00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    ITSM reports and dashboards00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    ITSM asset management
    Comparison of ITSM asset management features of OpenText ALM Octane and OpenText Service Manager
    Feature
    OpenText ALM Octane
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Service Manager
    9.7
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Configuration mangement00 Ratings9.72 Ratings
    Asset management dashboard00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    Policy and contract enforcement00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
    Change management
    Comparison of Change management features of OpenText ALM Octane and OpenText Service Manager
    Feature
    OpenText ALM Octane
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Service Manager
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Change requests repository00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Change calendar00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Service-level management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText ALM OctaneOpenText Service Manager
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    Ivanti ITSM
    Score6.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText ALM OctaneOpenText Service Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    9.6
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText ALM OctaneOpenText Service Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    If someone is already using ALM Octane, then it is worth the pain to go through the upgrade process to get the current versions. If you need it to tie into Jira, it can do that. Just be prepared for a rough road. If you have some other product that you use for DevOps, PM, and QA, you will probably be better off sticking with what you have. DaVita also uses TFS, but not in a full implementation (i.e. not with a build server for code deployment), so for them, ALM makes a lot of sense. If you are using TFS with a build server, there are other methodologies that won't end up making you want to pull your hair out trying to make it integrate with what you are using.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    HP Service Manager (HPSM) is well suited for a big company and it does the job that it's intended to do but it's not perfect. It has a fairly large learning curve for searching Knowledge Management (KMs) and it takes time to learn how to be fast at creating/resolving tickets while on calls. I have been using HPSM for about 2 years now and we recently moved from the desk client to the web client and we are seeing a lot more issues than we did with the desk client. They keep coming out with updates for it so eventually most of our issues will hopefully be resolved. Overall the web experience is better as it looks more modern than what we used in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Bug-logging and keeping track of the bug status.
    • Integration with DevOps to do continuous testing.
    • Keeping coordination between development and testing teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Capacity management like maintaining CI's and their relations is good.
    • Approvals with HPSM is a cake walk and quite logical.
    • There is no wait for troubleshooting or help, HPSM tech help is always there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • The integration to Synchronizer is very difficult to implement.
    • The integration to Jira was very hard to get working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • When you search Knowledge Articles, it is not like Google, and you need to learn how to search for what you need.
    • It takes a very long time to close tickets in HPSM. Here are the steps to close a ticket. 1. Add notes. 2. Add KM 3. Click Resolve 4.Click Save 5.Click Close 6.Click Okay to Message (ticket has recently been modified) 7. Click Close.
    • It's slow and sometimes crashes/freezes and you lose all the information you may have entered. I usually use notepad++ to gather all my notes and paste them into HPSM.
    • When searching previous tickets the preview pane does not allow for sorting by date to have the most recent at the very top every time you pull up previous tickets. Sometimes there are pages and pages of previous tickets and you have to click and scroll to get what you need.
    • I click on search KMs and it takes me to a blank page and I have to click the back button which then brings me to the search KM page.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Customer support is very good takes minimal time to resolve the issue and always takes feedback seriously to improve the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    Micro Focus ALM Octane use at DaVita goes back beyond my starting with them three years ago. They have used it as part of DevOps as well as for performance measurement of software releases in combo with HP Performance Center (a great combination). Jira is well suited to managing bug reports and development processes with Agile and Scrum, but ALM Octane goes above and beyond that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    [We selected HP Service Manager because] HPSM is reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • It's had a very positive impact.
    • Very good customer support as well when required.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • We take anywhere from between 850-1400 calls a day and overall the whole opening tickets to close process goes pretty smoothly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots