TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Picturepark

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    Picturepark

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AN/A

    $1,000

    per month

    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPicturepark
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic
    $1,000
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPicturepark
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPicturepark
    DAM Features
    Comparison of DAM Features features of OpenText Application Quality Management and Picturepark
    Feature
    OpenText Application Quality Management
    -
    Ratings
    Picturepark
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Uploading assets00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Downloading assets00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Categories00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Asset storage00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Asset sharing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Asset search00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Tagging system00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Content editing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Embed codes00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Metadata00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Collections00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    User access00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    DAM Integrations00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    DAM API00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of OpenText Application Quality Management and Picturepark
    Feature
    OpenText Application Quality Management
    -
    Ratings
    Picturepark
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Content analytics00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPicturepark
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Adobe Bridge
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Cloudinary
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    Acquia DAM (Widen)
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPicturepark
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementPicturepark
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vision Information Transaction
    It's a DAM system. It's well suited for organizing content and distributing it to different channels.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vision Information Transaction
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vision Information Transaction
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vision Information Transaction
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vision Information Transaction
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Vision Information Transaction
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots