OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Application Quality Management
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Replacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces is a Cloud Development Environment (CDE) platform built on the open-source Eclipse Che project. The solution provides developers with containerized, browser-accessible workspaces hosted directly within a Kubernetes/Red Hat OpenShift cluster.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
Best Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM Terraform
IBM Terraform
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Read full review
Red Hat
We have a team of 500 people so it's most reliable and scalable if any new joinees. That way user's can directly create their own workspace and start working and share the work stack throughout development teams securely, to update and modify any upcoming events. The best thing about Red Hat Workspace is it's simple, with all Runtime libraries pre-installed, so no need to request a platform from Azure or any other platform provider just log in and start creating a workspace. It has version control so can easily import GIT projects can start work without worrying we don't have Java, Python or any other platform not installed just select the platform needed and start working.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Cons
OpenText
  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Can improve UI like Visual studio so that VS user's can switch without any difficulty.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • No need to request for any platform again and again.
Read full review
ScreenShots