OpenText Application Quality Management vs. SimpleBackups

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Application Quality Management
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Replacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
SimpleBackups
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$34
per month
Pricing
OpenText Application Quality ManagementSimpleBackups
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$34
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementSimpleBackups
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Application Quality ManagementSimpleBackups
Considered Both Products
OpenText Application Quality Management
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools …
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
Accurev was in place when I was hired. We keep it for big projects. For small ones we use svn.
Chose OpenText Application Quality Management
Git is one obvious alternative. However, Git is leveraging the command line and has minimal interface. Developer must be acclimated with command line in order to use Git.
SimpleBackups

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality ManagementSimpleBackups
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementSimpleBackups
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Application Quality ManagementSimpleBackups
Likelihood to Recommend
This is one of the best version control tools I have used.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Creation of streams & workspaces are easy.
  • Easy integration with other bug tracking or tasking tools like JIRA.
  • File comparison and history is possible.
  • Project creation and setup is easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The tool allows duplicate file name, if both are present in different directories. This creates confusion if multiple people are working on the same file. It should at least produce a warning.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
I give it this rating because I found an alternate application that is much more cost effective and quicker
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Quick merging.
  • Easy to roll back changes.
  • Good tree view.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots