OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs. Rapise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LoadRunner Professional
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
Rapise
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Rapise is a software testing platform that allows users to regression test web, desktop and mobile applications. Some key features include: Playback of Tests, Test Script Editing and Data Driven Testing.
$799.99
Lifetime License per Seat
Pricing
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalRapise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
5-License Pack
$799.99
Lifetime License per Seat
10-License Pack
$799.99
Lifetime License per Seat
Single License
$899.99
Lifetime License per Seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LoadRunner ProfessionalRapise
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalRapise
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
8.4
6 Ratings
0% below category average
Rapise
-
Ratings
End to end performance management9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated performance data10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Real time monitoring6.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalRapise
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalRapise
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(7 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
3.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalRapise
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
The appropriate scenario to use Rapise is when we have a project that is considered from medium onwards, since Rapise will help us to define, develop and implement the testing phase in a reliable and efficient way. Also with Rapise we will not have to worry about the platform that we are using since it has great versatility and flexibility.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
  • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
  • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Simple recording front-end and easily captures UI objects for later interaction
  • Flexible programming interface provides a multitude of manners in which to interact with learned UI objects
  • Javascript based IDE is easy to learn
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
  • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
  • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
  • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • For tests that require specific approaches it is necessary to have advanced knowledge of programming in javascrip, which sometimes the QA team does not have experience
  • Sometimes I have noticed that when using object dragging errors occur intermittently
  • The integration with some tools (Dynamics) is only with the basic functions from my point of view
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
Mmuch better from a flexibility perspective
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
  • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • The primary objective of the institution is a service to the public, so everything that improves response times to the public helps us to achieve it.
  • As a department in charge of the development of systems and applications, our objective is fulfilled by delivering quality products and tools such as Rapise help us greatly
  • The return on investment can be more than justified by fulfilling the primary objectives
Read full review
ScreenShots

Rapise Screenshots

Screenshot of Testing DashboardScreenshot of Integrated Testing EnvironmentScreenshot of Reporting