OpenText Tempo (legacy) vs. ShareFile
OpenText Tempo (legacy) vs. ShareFile
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText Tempo (legacy) | N/A | The OpenText Tempo product family, now discontinued, was used for enterprise information management. It integrated OpenText's information governance capabilities with consumer-style file sharing and social collaboration apps to provide users with ways to collaborate and engage without compromising the security and compliance requirements of the enterprise. It is a legacy product line, and no longer available. | N/A | |
ShareFile | N/A | ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011. | $10 per month per user, per month, minimum of 3 users |
OpenText Tempo (legacy) | ShareFile | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
OpenText Tempo (legacy) | ShareFile | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
|
|
OpenText Tempo (legacy) | ShareFile | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Storage Platform |
|
OpenText Tempo (legacy) | ShareFile | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | SugarSync Score 10.0 out of 10 | SugarSync Score 10.0 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | M‑Files Score 9.2 out of 10 | Druva Data Resiliency Cloud Score 9.6 out of 10 |
Enterprises | M‑Files Score 9.2 out of 10 | Druva Data Resiliency Cloud Score 9.6 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
OpenText Tempo (legacy) | ShareFile | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.7 (88 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (8 ratings) |
Usability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (19 ratings) |
Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (14 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 1.1 (14 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (3 ratings) |
Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 5.0 (2 ratings) |
Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
OpenText Tempo (legacy) | ShareFile | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Pros | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Cons | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Likelihood to Renew | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Usability | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Reliability and Availability | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Performance | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Support Rating | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Implementation Rating | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Alternatives Considered | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Scalability | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
Return on Investment | Discontinued Products No answers on this topic | ShareFile |
ScreenShots | ShareFile Screenshots |