Likelihood to Recommend UFT mobile works really well if/when you need physical devices under your management. Managing physical devices in any setup is an interesting undertaking due to the various considerations per device. There are really nice best practices, for example using managed USB switches like the one from Cambrionix, that can help make for a really good experience. For us, we only have 1 application at this time that has frequent updates/releases. We are able to test out these with confidence using our suite of real/on-campus devices managed and made available by the UFT Mobile product.
Read full review The appropriate scenario to use Rapise is when we have a project that is considered from medium onwards, since Rapise will help us to define, develop and implement the testing phase in a reliable and efficient way. Also with Rapise we will not have to worry about the platform that we are using since it has great versatility and flexibility.
Read full review Pros Remote access to real devices within your organization network as compared to public devices library offering, where their is a risk of exposing pre-production builds outside the organization. "Factory built like" integration with HP ALM, HP Sprinter, HP UFT and HP Network Virtualization. Ability to mimic real world conditions in a controlled environment in the devices of your choice. Removed the guess work out of using emulators Able to extend automation to mobile testing using HP UFT. Read full review Simple recording front-end and easily captures UI objects for later interaction Flexible programming interface provides a multitude of manners in which to interact with learned UI objects Javascript based IDE is easy to learn Read full review Cons Most of our problems are with the lengthy onboarding process with iOS devices. Occasionally Android devices will disconnect themselves. Read full review For tests that require specific approaches it is necessary to have advanced knowledge of programming in javascrip, which sometimes the QA team does not have experience Sometimes I have noticed that when using object dragging errors occur intermittently The integration with some tools (Dynamics) is only with the basic functions from my point of view Read full review Likelihood to Renew The tool continues to meet our expectations and has shown that they are continually evolving the product with new features that benefit us. The most recent new feature was the auto-signing/packaging of iOS apps from the server to allow native interaction of features like biometrics. Prior this was a lengthy exercise.
Read full review Alternatives Considered HP Mobile Center stacks well against solutions like Mobile Labs Device Connect, Perfecto Mobile and Device Anywhere. Its native integration with
HP ALM and HP
UFT makes it a clear choice for team already using those solutions. HP Mobile Center also provides extension to Amazon Device Library.
Read full review Mmuch better from a flexibility perspective
Read full review Return on Investment Efficient use of the devices. Reduced the idle time. Better control over access and user management. Testing within our controlled environments. Better control of device matrix. Faster testing cycles. Early design bugs to development teams. Real devices means, less guess work. Read full review The primary objective of the institution is a service to the public, so everything that improves response times to the public helps us to achieve it. As a department in charge of the development of systems and applications, our objective is fulfilled by delivering quality products and tools such as Rapise help us greatly The return on investment can be more than justified by fulfilling the primary objectives Read full review ScreenShots