OpenText Web CMS vs. TYPO3

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
TYPO3
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
TYPO3 CMS is an open source web content management system with a global community, backed by the approximately 900 members of the TYPO3 Association.
$0
Pricing
OpenText Web CMSTYPO3
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Web CMSTYPO3
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Web CMSTYPO3
Features
OpenText Web CMSTYPO3
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
TYPO3
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
TYPO3
-
Ratings
API8.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language7.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
TYPO3
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor7.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates7.46 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes8.36 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design8.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Form generator8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
6% above category average
TYPO3
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy7.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management8.27 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions7.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Web CMSTYPO3
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Web CMSTYPO3
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(8 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.6
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Web CMSTYPO3
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Open Source
TYPO3 is great if you need to connect some systems in company to work together: like ecommerce + CRM + ERP + MRP and build an Extranet for partners/dealers where they can order your products, see particular BOM (bill of material), paid/unpaid invoices and use email marketing on top of it. You can do it but keep in mind that you will need a dedicated hosting, well organized admin(s) and some handwritten code. For simple blog TYPO3 is also a good choose, but WP would be better I think.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • The drag and drop forms feature makes publishing simple and quick.
  • Preview of customer data before sending publications helps us to deliver personalized experiences.
Read full review
Open Source
  • open source - do what you want, and even if you dont know how to do it - someone will do it for you
  • more secure than others (Joomla, WP, Drupal) - thanks to dedicated Typo3 Security Team
  • modularity and diversity - a lot of plugins/extensions
  • workflow and user roles - feel free to build a workflow templates ie. for documents routing
  • assets management - no matter is it a video, audio or text file, you can REALLY manage it.
  • typoscript language - sometimes JS is not enough
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
Open Source
  • compared do Wordpress - far less community support
  • when you run a simple blog - it is simple as piece of cake. But if it is a large news site, with many user roles, extensions and permissions - it may be hard to find an admin that will organize and keep that stuff working.
  • server resources: so you want performance and speed with all that modules enabled? make sure that you have dedicated server in most cases. WP works much better here.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
Open Source
  • more complex and elastic revoke system (undoing changes for multi-administrator systems) PHP/JS and TypoScript language
  • LTS - long ter msupport (bugfixes and updates)
  • usage rights and permissions (much more advanced thatn in WP/Joomla)
  • separation of design and content (in WP also but here is complex)
  • many plugins to integrate with external systems
  • several portals may be operated from a single admin/install
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
OpenText
The annual contract should be clearer in terms of the breakdown of user license types (system admin, admin, regular user, etc).
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
Open Source
  • + 1 platform that handles connections to 11 external systems (CMS, CMR, ERP, MRP, accounting, controlling, email marketing etc.)
  • + still lower TCO than commercial systems (Oracle, Microsoft)
  • + LTS - long term support - can provide you an updates or bugfixes
  • - resource consuming (forget about shared hosting in large projects)
Read full review
ScreenShots

TYPO3 Screenshots

Screenshot of TYPO3 backendScreenshot of TYPO3 backendScreenshot of TYPO3 backendScreenshot of TYPO3 backendScreenshot of TYPO3 backendScreenshot of TYPO3 backend