Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing vs. RavenDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Autonomous Transaction Processing, supporting database self-repair and maintenance with machine learning to eliminate human labor, human error, and manual tuning.
$1.34
OCPU Per Hour
RavenDB
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
RavenDB is a NoSQL Document Database that is fully transactional (ACID) across the database and throughout clusters. It is presented as an easy to use all-in-one database that minimizes the need for third party addons, tools, or support to boost developer productivity and get projects into production fast. Users can setup and secure a data cluster deploy in the cloud, on…N/A
Pricing
Oracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingRavenDB
Editions & Modules
Transaction Processing
$1.34
OCPU Per Hour
Exadata Storage
$118.40
Per Terabyte Per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingRavenDB
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingRavenDB
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Oracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingRavenDB
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
-
Ratings
RavenDB
9.1
24 Ratings
4% above category average
Performance00 Ratings9.024 Ratings
Availability00 Ratings8.923 Ratings
Concurrency00 Ratings8.023 Ratings
Security00 Ratings9.223 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings9.623 Ratings
Data model flexibility00 Ratings9.924 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.423 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingRavenDB
Small Businesses
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingRavenDB
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(2 ratings)
8.2
(24 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(5 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
8.3
(20 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(21 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingRavenDB
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
If your company's value is not increased by maintaining databases, you should use the ATP.
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
If you're a.NET developer searching for a system other than SQL Server for business assessment, then you must try RavenDB. RavenDB is a fantastic document-oriented system that has been specifically developed to work with all.NET or Windows systems. Developers are continually working on such systems to eliminate their flaws while also providing a few benefits. We must refresh ourselves on a regular basis since the free software system is like an open area where anybody may stand up with a brilliant solution to the issue. RavenDB is absolutely worth a look
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • Quick and simple to deploy (less than 5 steps to create a new instance)
  • No administrative tasks (backup, re-sizing) required
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
  • Document Database - no Object-Relational Impedance Mismatch
  • ACID support that is optimized for performance
  • Can be easily integrated into automated tests (unit tests)
  • Easily configurable via C# code
  • Comes directly with RavenStudio - no SSMS or SQL Developer required
  • In general low footprint when it comes to memory and disk consumption
  • Useful safety nets for new developers - e.g. by default an exception is thrown when you make too many requests within a session
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • Connectivity between ATP and Oracle Kuberentes Engine cluster seems to drop randomly
  • The ATP could come in an even smaller shape as the smallest shape is already quite big . But if must be more than always free, as that version does have connectivity limitations about 20 connections
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
  • The documentation is very good, but it's sometimes hard to find the topic I'm looking for.
  • Updating references is done manually. It would be nice if there was a feature to help with that. I'm not sure that's even possible though.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Hibernating Rhinos
We've had an excellent experience using RavenDB. Internally we are testing the newer features in 5.0 such as time series, which will effect the con specified previously dependent on the real world performance. We foresee that BattleCrate will continue to use RavenDB as we grow.
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
You get almost all the features of Oracle Database, including the ability to deploy APEX applications, without having to worry about system, storage or database configuration and maintenance, backups, etc. Also, you can start for free and move up adding resources as you need.
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
Really good .NET client that is very easy to use. The management studio is excellent and puts anything that Microsoft or Oracle have to shame. Very quick to develop with once the complexity hurdle has been overcome. Initially using it can be a bit painful until you fully grasp the event sourced nature of the indexing.
Read full review
Support Rating
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Hibernating Rhinos
The support is really fast and flexible. Since one single working day, we got a response to our first request, only 4 days later we got a technical demonstration for our complete developer team to get in touch with raven and its performance. Also during our development, we got a quick response to questions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Hibernating Rhinos
RavenFS changed along the way and made us change the codes.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
Both Azure SQL Database and Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing offer a powerful and robust database platform. The advantage of Autonomous Transaction Processing is the ability to host APEX applications for free and without any special/complicated deployment or configuration process. Having a rapid development environment embedded for free was the main advantage for choosing Oracle as my cloud database provider.
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
The given alternatives are also powerful and really good noSQL databases but the highest availability of RavenDB allows me/us to know it a lot better. RavenDB is encrypted by default wherever we use it in production and it has a high level of documents compression.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • Approx 100 times faster spin up than manual setup of an Oracle DB
  • 3h annual maintenance for big version releases (18c to 19c) compared to est. 500h annual maintenance with manual database updates
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
  • RavenDB has saved my customers a lot of money with their cloud services' tiered model. The database is able to grow with the project/company and can start out small at a low cost.
  • RavenDB is free for three nodes and three CPUs, which makes it great for development scenarios. You're able to start rapidly building applications without having to worry about licensing.
  • Scaling out has allowed us to use three small cloud servers when starting out and get the performance and throughput of a single larger server.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing Screenshots

Screenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database takes automatic backupsScreenshot of Provisioning a new Autonomous Transaction Processing is simpleScreenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database  ConsoleScreenshot of Auto scaling and manual scaling options of the database