Oracle Database vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Database
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Database, currently in edition 23ai, is a converged, multimodel database management system. It is designed to simplify development for AI, microservices, graph, document, spatial, and relational applications.
$0.05
per hour
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a transactional relational database, boasting fast, reliable online transaction processing (OLTP). SAP ASE is the company's transactional database within the SAP Business Technology Platform portfolio.N/A
Pricing
Oracle DatabaseSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Editions & Modules
Oracle Base Database Service - Standard
$0.0538
per hour
Oracle Base Database Service - Enterprise
$0.1075
per hour
Oracle Base Database Service - High Performance
$0.2218
per hour
Standard Edition
Contact Sales
Enterprise Edition
Contact Sales
Personal Edition
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle DatabaseSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle DatabaseSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Considered Both Products
Oracle Database
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle is more of an enterprise-level database than Access and SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise isn't getting developed much (some people wonder how close it is to end of life) but SQL Server is miles ahead of Oracle IMO in terms of user experience and comparable in terms of …
Chose Oracle Database
I have selected Oracle database from other databases as this database is relational database which stored the data in structural and tabular format which is better than any other databases which I have used in my carrier. Also MongoDB is no SQL database where we can use SQL …
Chose Oracle Database
Oracle Database is best in business, consistent, and robust. Even the standard version is sufficient for the best performance. The main thing is I have never seen corruption and in my opinion, it is best when used with Linux.
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)

No answer on this topic

Features
Oracle DatabaseSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Database
8.5
5 Ratings
4% above category average
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
8.3
1 Ratings
2% above category average
ACID compliance8.85 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Database monitoring8.85 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Database locking8.85 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Encryption9.84 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Disaster recovery9.34 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Flexible deployment6.25 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Multiple datatypes8.05 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle DatabaseSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle DatabaseSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(191 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(6 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.4
(5 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
9.7
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.6
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle DatabaseSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
We migrated from NoSQL to an Oracle database. One of the reasons was robust backup and recovery options available in the Oracle database, which provide zero data loss. A transactional database like Oracle is a better fit for our use case than NoSQL. On a large scale, deployment was evaluated as a cheaper option than the NoSQL engine. This conclusion came even after considering Oracle license is expensive.
Read full review
SAP
We use this for an inbuilt security management system, where it performs well in a scaled setup with a large volume of live data with high availability. Also, the performance is up to the mark for the large statement flow. From a DBA perspective, a lot of parameters need to be fine-tuned for the specific environment needs, which can cause overhead. Expertise is limited, and the learning curve is steep for the SAP ASE.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • Supports most of the Operating Systems like Unix, Linux and Windows Server.
  • It works well in high load environment under intense parallel transactions setup.
  • Highly reliable DBMS, especially RAC is very much reliable.
  • Well managed and predictable release of security patches.
  • We have highly scaled it from on-prem to a cloud cluster environment for our product.
  • One of the best-performing DBMSs on Linux machines under test delivers high throughput (QPS).
Read full review
SAP
  • High availability and reliability.
  • High performance.
  • Monitoring of threshold based events.
  • Security at multiple levels.
  • Query plan optimization.
  • Lock management.
  • Access to HANA.
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • The memory demand and management makes it impossible to run it in a container.
  • It is hard to perform local unit testing with Oracle even using the personal edition (aggressive all the available memory grab for itself).
  • Lack of built in database migrations (e.g. as Flyway).
  • The need to install the Oracle client in addition to its drivers.
  • The cost of running it, especially in the Cloud.
  • Comes with very spartan community grade client/management tools whereas the commercial offerings tend to demand a premium price.
Read full review
SAP
  • A quick button for devs to switch instances into a dev mode (eliminating logs, and such).
  • Licensing is far too complicated. Simplify pricing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Oracle
There is a lot of sunk cost in a product like Oracle 12c. It is doing a great job, it would not provide us much benefit to switch to another product even if it did the same thing due to the work involved in making such a switch. It would not be cost effective.
Read full review
SAP
Our licenses are perpetual. It is the support that we will be renewing. We will renew because we continue to use and receive value from the product.
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
Many of the powerful options can be auto-configured but there are still many things to take into account at the moment of installing and configuring an Oracle Database, compared with SQL Server or other databases. At the same time, that extra complexity allows for detailed configuration and guarantees performance, scalability, availability and security.
Read full review
SAP
Well-suited in the security domain, high performance, and low latency of the DBMS. In terms of the DBA perspective, a dedicated monitoring tool (Cockpit) helps a lot in terms of managing the database, which helps in identifying bottlenecks during performance issues. Also, it helps us to send custom alerts related to Database activities.
Read full review
Support Rating
Oracle
1. I have very good experience with Oracle Database support team. Oracle support team has pool of talented Oracle Analyst resources in different regions. To name a few regions - EMEA, Asia, USA(EST, MST, PST), Australia. Their support staffs are very supportive, well trained, and customer focused. Whenever I open Oracle Sev1 SR(service request), I always get prompt update on my case timely. 2. Oracle has zoom call and chat session option linked to Oracle SR. Whenever you are in Oracle portal - you can chat with the Oracle Analyst who is working on your case. You can request for Oracle zoom call thru which you can share the your problem server screen in no time. This is very nice as it saves lot of time and energy in case you have to follow up with oracle support for your case. 3.Oracle has excellent knowledge base in which all the customer databases critical problems and their solutions are well documented. It is very easy to follow without consulting to support team at first.
Read full review
SAP
Incredibly responsive, saving us countless hours in troubleshooting.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Oracle
Overall the implementation went very well and after that everything came out as expected - in terms of performance and scalability. People should always install and upgrade a stable version for production with the latest patch set updates, test properly as much as possible, and should have a backup plan if anything unexpected happens
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
Because of a rich user base and support for any critical issue, this is one of the best options to choose. In case the project has a TCO issue, it can compromise and choose Postgres as the best alternative. SQL server is also good and easy to code and maintain but performance is not as good as the Oracle
Read full review
SAP
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • Multiple applications can use the same database and still get high performance
  • Licensing cost is still a concern compared to the other options available in the market that are very very inexpensive
  • Almost a maintenance free database
  • Oracle Grid makes life easy in terms of monitoring and managing the databases
Read full review
SAP
  • Positive ROI.
  • Ease of use with minimal training required to write high performance SQL (assumes a knowledge of SQL already).
  • Ease of database administration.
  • Sometimes upgrades can be difficult.
  • Changing platforms can be difficult (changing say from SPARC to Intel).
  • Changing operating systems can be difficult (changing from Solaris to linux).
Read full review
ScreenShots