Oracle FLEXCUBE vs. Temenos Transact - Core Banking

The system is very user-friendly and provides help in performing UAT and making the processes live, payment method opt without interacting with humans. Automation of the processes is marvelous.

Incentivized

Due to cloud based solution when I was not in town and want some technical assistance for branch or any financial transaction, it is easy to access it from anywhere plus there is 24/7 reports available. It is easy for development team for new functionalities to implement. There is one down side we experienced that whenever there are largen numbers of user signed in, system get but slow.

• Scalability
• Multi Lingual
• The modules covers all areas of banking
• Integration with other solutions

Incentivized

• Payments
• Retail
• Corporate
• Bulk posting
• 24/7 reports

• Improve workflow for frontline user
• Established own implementation resource rather than use a partner
• It would be good if Oracle maintained a local support office in Cambodia

Incentivized

• Technical documentation
• High cost
• slow when many user are logged in

Support is very expensive and not always up to speed with the market and the latest developments. The support is highly fragmented as well and split among 2-3 Oracle departments.

Incentivized

Incentivized

• Wholesale banking for cash trade.
• Payments of cash.
• Treasury and lending.

Incentivized

• High number of users
• Handling bulk posting
• Payments