Oracle GlassFish Server vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle GlassFish Server
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle GlassFish Server was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and is available open source or supported by Oracle. It is an application server.N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
Oracle GlassFish ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle GlassFish ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle GlassFish ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Considered Both Products
Oracle GlassFish Server

No answer on this topic

Oracle WebLogic Server
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is much more stable when compared to opensource application servers like Oracle GlassFish Server or Apache Tomcat. Coming to JBoss Enterprise Application Server, Oracle WebLogic Application Server has better support with most of the cloud …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Weblogic is heavy machinery for medium/large enterprises, while Jboss can be used discreetly. Glassfish is the ancestor of Weblogic and the advantage is the free Enterprise version. If you don't have much to invest, Glassfish 3 could be a great alternative. Apache Tomcat and …
Features
Oracle GlassFish ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Oracle GlassFish Server
8.8
3 Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
36 Ratings
2% above category average
IDE support9.03 Ratings6.032 Ratings
Security management9.03 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Administration and management8.03 Ratings7.036 Ratings
Application server performance10.03 Ratings8.535 Ratings
Installation7.03 Ratings8.036 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance9.82 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle GlassFish ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle GlassFish ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(3 ratings)
7.5
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle GlassFish ServerOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
Glassfish is well suited for large-scale cluster deployments and integrates well with F5 load balancers.
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • The product offers Java EE support.
  • As the version supported by Oracle we have an extensive documentation, the Oracle GlassFish server online documentation library, patches ,and support from the supplier.
  • Ease of use through the administration console.
  • Integration with the NetBeans development interface.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • One of the areas where we found Glassfish adaptation difficult for our company was the lack of documentation and community forums covering important issues.
  • We ran into a roadblock with OAuth 2.0 implementation and did not get great support on that issue.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Debugging issues has been difficult sometimes, the documentation is too dense and finding the the root cause for an specific issue takes time.
  • The Oracle WebLogic Server console UI feels old and gives a sense of lack of innovation even though it provides so much functionality.
  • I'm not sure if Oracle WebLogic Server supports more modern frameworks, but it feels more like a Java EE specific, maybe there's an opportunity there to appeal to newer application platforms
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Performance
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
At the time we did a small proof of concept with both platforms and Oracle Glassfish had more intuitive administration and configuration functions
Read full review
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • Glassfish which initially spun off from an Open Source project has a community edition which is free to use and offers great ROI.
  • In comparison to cloud offerings like AWS and Google App Engine, Glassfish requires more cost upfront for installation and management.
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots