Oracle Hyperion (legacy) vs. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.N/A
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.N/A
Pricing
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Considered Both Products
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion was easier to use and learn and problem solve issues than Oracle Financials
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Compared with some of the other products that had been used, Oracle Hyperion had solved the major impediment of integrating multiple ERP systems (both SAP and non-SAP) with relative ease while providing the business the leverage to analyze, comprehend, and rectify the data.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion makes it easier to create reports based on the data available on Hyperion. However is Phocas is better for drilling down information and it is also much more mobile.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
None of the other products used or evaluated are available for me to select.
I have used EPMware with is a competing software to DRM. I find the ROI on this tool greater then DRM. It is about a quarter of the cost and directly interfaces with multiple Hyperion applications.
CXO …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product.
Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
It is the leading system, with the most power and flexibility of any of these. It is also the most expensive. Berkeley needs the best possible tool for this job. Questica and Workday cannot handle the number of dimensions we use. Adaptive might be a good competitor but since I …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We utilize Tableau as well for reporting, but the good thing about OracleHyperion Enterprise Performance Management is it is in sync with our ledger as we utilize Oracle Ledger from our side. Tableau has a better user interface but the EPM's understanding of the data makes it …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
When we were trying to decide between Oracle Hyperion and SAP BPC, the cost and functionality were pretty much the same between both products, but we decided for the Oracle solution as it was better positioned in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for consolidation softwares, and some …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Due to being the industry forefront and owned by Oracle
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Oracle has led the charge on the development of true EPM reporting. The development of rudimentary KPIs to much more complex models all can be housed and managed by Hyperion. Integrates with Office through Smartview, which provides flexibility in creating Word documents, board …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We also took a look to Cognos, but since we have Oracle eBS as our main ERP, we decided without a very deep analysis.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
In our review, Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management stacks up pretty well against SAP Business Warehouse. The most glaring area was cost. For a product capable of the same level of reporting day in and day out, Hyperion offered the best bang for the buck. This …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Toyota has a global presence and deals with different countries and different currencies. To manage finance, this tool is the most reliable tool I found if the company has a global presence. If you deal with any tool to manage Financial matters, performance and reliability is …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Pricing is one factor and the features offered by the Oracle EPM and IBM cognos shifted the favour in terms of Oracle EPM.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We have evaluated other options in the past, and we are currently re-evaluating some of the SaaS providers due to the increased strength of those products over the last few years. However, our biggest need continues to be a very capable consolidation tool as we are …
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement.
The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing.
Also having Oracle database that comes with …
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
We currently use ADP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Because Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is so costly for payroll processing we have had to use ADP to finish up the processing of payroll. We use ADP for direct deposits and recording manual checks. ADP is not as …
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
JD Edwards Enterprise is more robust than Netsuite or MSD GP. It has significantly more experience in the field. However, it's also an aging application and not nearly as agile as those two. I've also found resources to be less expensive with a broader knowledge of the …
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
It think this system has more controls than Epicor.
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
The user interface and reporting factors for Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are exceptional compared to other tools. The Cafe One features and other reporting enhancements have made the most difference to accountants and process owners. The Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne …
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
The cost was the main focus. The organization needed something easy to use, optimal and wouldn't break the bank. When keeping track of a large number of employees, it was vital that this software be easy to input, use and implement (both on the user and administrative sides). …
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Our JD Edwards was implemented 10 years ago and I was not part of the decision making
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Netsuite is more configurable with dashboards and modern technology
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Have checked out Peoplesoft. It is a great package for human resources area. JDE is a financial system and all the other reguler systems that feeds to financials.
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
I can't say that I have extensive knowledge about Sage, but I will say that for the months I did use it, I found JDE to be far superior.
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
World is not as user friendly as EnterpriseOne.
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
I was not part of the JD Edwards selection process. I understand that normally SAP and MS Dynamics are usually products evaluated alongside JD Edwards EnterpriseOne.
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a well defined market presence for small to mid-size companies. SAP seems to play in the larger company space. The other Oracle ERP solutions include Oracle E-Business Suite and Fusion Applications. JDE E1 was mainly selected for its …
Features
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
10.0
Ratings
9% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
8.2
Ratings
0% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
Pricing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Billing Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
Ratings
23% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
Ratings
2% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings4.30 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
Ratings
13% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings4.30 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
Ratings
14% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
Read full review
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
Read full review
Pros
  • HFM is very powerful for financial consolidations .
  • Hyperion Planning is used to project accurate planning and thus provide the benefit to organization to do allocations and driver based planning so that it can justify the numbers based on headcount, number of stops & Revenue and thus provide valuable projections and thus help reduce the expenses.
  • Essbase is powerful engine helps provide analytical adhoc reporting for financial users . Performance of reporting and ease of use helps excellent customers experience when doing adhoc analysis.
Read full review
  • JD Edwards is very configurable in handling different sales order entry scenarios.
  • JD Edwards can be customized to present focused information on the login screen of a user so a user can better focus on the applications or reports that are relevant to their job.
  • JD Edwards is also very effective in creating relationships between various customer accounts and the relationships between them.
Read full review
Cons
  • Oracle Hyperion requires a lot of knowledge and expertise to be successful.
  • The underlying infrastructure of Oracle Hyperion is complex and can be difficult to implement.
  • Some of the Oracle Hyperion application servers only run on Windows. Windows can sometimes be unstable.
  • Oracle Hyperion application server processes are dependent on each other and need to be started in a specific order. Therefore, if certain services die on one server, it could require all services/processes in the entire Hyperion landscape to be restarted in the correct order.
Read full review
  • The interface is aging - The application has been around quite a while. Even with the more modern UI, it still feels like a 90's application and doesn't provide the quick augmentation options like what is found in Netsuite or cloud apps.
  • A premise based - It's an application that was built to run on mini/mainframe environments, which were great for its time. However, in comparison to the hand's free environments in the cloud, it requires more iron and humans to maintain the solution.
  • Speed to roll out new business models - It felt like, once you deployed a business setup, it was difficult to change and add new business features, especially those that contradict previous directions.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
great design and continuous improvements
Read full review
Support Rating
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product. Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different business systems is also considered while selecting this product.
Read full review
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We had to get the planning application designed correctly before we got a good ROI, but once we did it became well liked and highly utilized.
  • It has had a very positive overall impact on increasing finance literacy across campus, allowing units a better insight into their revenues and expenses and the overall planning process.
  • It has been an essential tool during a time where the campus needed to reduce it's budget by over 100 million dollars annually. Without this product, we would not have a way to identify, track and report on our progress reducing the budget.
Read full review
  • The EnterpriseOne toolset is flexible and easily usable. Since they continue to invest and grow the product, we do get a good ROI out of it.
  • The software was already here and installed when I started at this company but the business users seemed to really like it and adapt to it well so it must feed the need to manage our inventory and financials, etc.
Read full review
ScreenShots