Oracle Textura Payment Management vs. Stax Bill

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
A construction payment management application that helps general contractors, owners, and subcontractors simplify and automate the draw process. Reduces risk by securely managing lien waivers and compliance. Increases visibility to downstream payments to minimize the risk of disruption and ensure the entire supply chain is paid on time for work completed.N/A
Stax Bill
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$199
per month
Pricing
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementStax Bill
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$199
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementStax Bill
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementStax Bill
Accounts Receivable
Comparison of Accounts Receivable features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Textura Payment Management
9.8
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Stax Bill
-
Ratings
Invoice Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Tracking9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Reminders10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Reconciliation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dispute Resolution10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementStax Bill
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.9 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 7.6 out of 10
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
BlackLine
BlackLine
Score 8.9 out of 10
BlackLine
BlackLine
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementStax Bill
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Textura Payment ManagementStax Bill
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
For a GC that wants to make things easier for both the themselves and all subs, this is absolutely the best solution out there. Some GCs still approve changes using purchase orders rather than change orders and allow invoicing to occur at any time during the month However, they should change their process to align with Oracle Textura Payment Management's draws. Without a draw process and confirmed invoice submission along with ACH payments, we have had invoices lost, payments lost, and time lost from having to track all of it. I can't think of a reason it would not be appropriate.
Read full review
Fattmerchant
No answers on this topic
Pros
Oracle
  • AIA Billing
  • ACH Payments
  • SOV Management
  • Communications
  • User Management
  • Compliance Holds
Read full review
Fattmerchant
No answers on this topic
Cons
Oracle
  • Task Management needs a "Mark all as Read" or similar function. They pile up per job and are only able to be completed using certain links and processes.
  • Payment Notification emails should include payment details including amount(s), joint check info, and check numbers.
  • Projects should be able to be removed or archived by the subcontractor. We have jobs showing on our home page that are 3+ years since completion.
  • Retention billing is very confusing and should be communicated more clearly. There should also be a button that allows for all retention to be billed at once rather than having to type in the amount per line item.
  • Sub-Tiers should not be a menu to click through if there are no sub-tiers for a sub.
Read full review
Fattmerchant
No answers on this topic
Usability
Oracle
Although there are minor improvements to be made, Oracle Textura Payment Management is far and away the easiest payment solution out there for any invoicing procedure that requires monthly draws.
Read full review
Fattmerchant
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
Oracle Textura Payment Management is better and more refined than similar products. Procore has a ton of other useful features and GCPay is straightforward with a simple UI. Like most things in tech, it comes down to user base and Oracle Textura Payment Management has the most jobs of ours using it meaning it has the biggest positive impact on our business.
Read full review
Fattmerchant
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • Oracle Textura Payment Management has dramatically improved our AR process (when the GC uses it). We wish that every job used it so we wouldn't have to deal with the dozens of builder-specific invoicing processes each month. Before Oracle Textura Payment Management, each builder had specific process we had to follow in order to get paid. After GCs started to use it, we have been able to consolidate multiple clients and jobs into a single easy-to-learn and easy-to-teach process that allows us to submit invoices easily and track when we are going to get paid.
Read full review
Fattmerchant
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots