Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.
N/A
SAP BPM
Score7 out of 10
N/A
SAP NetWeaver Business Process Management is a business process management offering and application infrastructure. It supports joint modeling of processes, central process execution via a Java-based engine, provision of interfaces for users, and integration of business rules into processes.
N/A
Pricing
Oracle WebCenter Content
SAP BPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle WebCenter Content
SAP BPM
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle WebCenter Content
SAP BPM
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
4 Ratings
6% below category average
SAP NetWeaver BPM
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
7.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
6.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
18% above category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
18% above category average
Social collaboration tools
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is well suited when we need to integrate business processes with SAP ERP and SAP CRM - the solution can be integrated with business rules/procedures defined in SAP ERP/CRM and NetWeaver can be used to monitor the rules and flag off exceptions. When there are multiple workflows running, it tends to slow down running of these processes. Also, it entirely depends on SAP portal for it to run efficiently.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
We have our own tech support for systems, I would say they probably could use more training on it, I don't really think it's anything regarding the SAP system, but more the knowledge they have on the system itself. It seems to take longer for them to fix any issues we may come across.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
I found the initial setup of NetWeaver is much simpler than other products especially in an SAP environment where we have SAP ERP/HRM/CRM as it can be well integrated with other SAP products. The only drawback is the need/dependency on SAP Portal. It is better suited in an environment where SAP ERP is running.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info