TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Oracle WebCenter Content vs. SAP NetWeaver BPM

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle WebCenter Content

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A

    SAP BPM

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ASAP NetWeaver Business Process Management is a business process management offering and application infrastructure. It supports joint modeling of processes, central process execution via a Java-based engine, provision of interfaces for users, and integration of business rules into processes.N/A
    Pricing
    Oracle WebCenter ContentSAP BPM
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle WebCenter ContentSAP BPM
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Oracle WebCenter ContentSAP BPM
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    7.6
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management7.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration8.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    26% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Social collaboration tools00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Oracle WebCenter Content and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Content management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle WebCenter ContentSAP BPM
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle WebCenter ContentSAP BPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.2
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle WebCenter ContentSAP BPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    It is well suited when we need to integrate business processes with SAP ERP and SAP CRM - the solution can be integrated with business rules/procedures defined in SAP ERP/CRM and NetWeaver can be used to monitor the rules and flag off exceptions. When there are multiple workflows running, it tends to slow down running of these processes. Also, it entirely depends on SAP portal for it to run efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
    • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
    • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
    • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
    • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Virtual paper trail. Iterations of process and current documentation are all stored as "artifacts", leaving a great trail.
    • Configuration of users. BPM somewhat magically determines which users will be impacted and automates rules.
    • A pro (that is also a con) is the design interface. If you know what you are doing, it is incredibly powerful and malleable.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Some functionality you would expect to be built-in (such as reporting for compliance) is not and requires other Oracle products to be integrated.
    • Separating an invoice with multiple lines for different departments is not an easy task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Live readings would be nice.
    • Easier to maneuver
    • Work with all systems with the press of one keystroke
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
    Read full review
    SAP
    As a big fan of SAP in general, the BPM solution fits right in with all the other things SAP does well, and does it with incredible efficiency
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    We have our own tech support for systems, I would say they probably could use more training on it, I don't really think it's anything regarding the SAP system, but more the knowledge they have on the system itself. It seems to take longer for them to fix any issues we may come across.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
    Read full review
    SAP
    I found the initial setup of NetWeaver is much simpler than other products especially in an SAP environment where we have SAP ERP/HRM/CRM as it can be well integrated with other SAP products. The only drawback is the need/dependency on SAP Portal. It is better suited in an environment where SAP ERP is running.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
    • WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
    • WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
    • Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Helped us harness integrated benefit from having SAP ERP/CRM by leveraging NetWeaver to define business processes/rules and monitor exceptions
    • Did not have any negative experience except for the fact that at times when multiple rules run, it can be somewhat slow
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots