Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access vs. Proofpoint Web Security

Depending on the complexity of your equipment, devices, the network you are with, the size of your company, or the budget you are willing to pay, you should consider buying Prisma. I have in mind that it is a tool to make the leap to extra security for your devices; it is a complex tool that cannot be learned in a single day. Without a doubt, I would recommend her to a company that has a proven track record and knows what it wants.

Incentivized

I think [Proofpoint Meta (formerly Meta Networks)] is a pretty robust VPN solution that would be good for most [organizations].

Incentivized

• Complete control and configuration of iOS devices across our network.
• Great username options in the latest version to help keep our devices organized and easy to manage.
• Easy to enroll devices to connect to the VPN.

Incentivized

• Stable VPN - 99.999 uptime
• Fast connection - have POP all around the world
• Enhanced security - flexible user policy.

Incentivized

• It lags a bit on new features
• It is best used with an entire Palo Alto environment

Incentivized

• Faster SSL vpn would be nice.

Incentivized

The management of connections is much more seamless with the Palo tool. AnyConnect was always a nightmare to get in and manage individual connections to what can and cannot be accessed based on IP addresses. We ended going with the newer methodology of remote access so that our users would be authenticated prior to entering login credentials.

Incentivized

Meta was agile and gave us the product we were looking for. the other vendors were lacking a lot of features or had a difficult deployment.

Incentivized

• It allowed us to pass very strict audits from the world's largest banks.
• It was easy for our IT department to implement.

Incentivized

• Positive - it let the company WFH in a pretty decent manner so no [work] hours were lost.

Incentivized