| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Wondershare PDFelement | Score5 out of 10 | N/A | PDFelement is a document management solution from Wondershare Software headquartered in China. | $79.99 per year per user |
| Wondershare PDFelement | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | For Individuals: Yearly Plan: $79.99/user; 2-Year Plan: $109.99/user Perpetual Plan(one-time): $129.99/user For Teams: Yearly plan starts at $109/year for 1 user For Education: Yearly Plan: $47.99/user; Perpetual Plan(one-time): $99.99/user | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Wondershare PDFelement | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement is the ideal solution for Adobe Acrobat because of its small size, clean interface, quick start, strong features, light system resource usage, and low pricing. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement They are doing quite aggressive marketing, therefore it is very present everywhere. Pricing is in the range for private users. If features are improved, I probably would buy it again, otherwise think next time would try the competition (e.g., Nitro). Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement Adobe Acrobat. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement I used Adobe Acrobat for around 15 years in different large scale companies. But it is too expensive for single users or small enterprises and Adobe offers only yearly subscription which I personally do not like. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement We selected PDFelement because it did the job well and at the lowest cost of our options. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement I haven't evaluated any other products. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement I don't even remember the name of the products I tried, but none of them worked right. PDFelement does the job and does it well. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement The experience is different. From a cost perspective, PDFelement is more cost effective and can get things done. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement Adobe PDF is the alternative for me but much more expensive. It has more features but I don’t need them. For a small business PDFelement's affordability makes it a cost effective option. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement I didn't try or buy other programs, but did a good bit of research on them. I went with PDFelement because of the lower pricing, and because of the rich features I learned it had. I also appreciated the great customer service I received from reps in the community forums, which … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement No other products outside Adobe. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement I have evaluated Acrobat but found it less user friendly than PDFelement and very expensive on a product to product comparison Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement has among the several options available in the market, a productivity solution with relevant acquisition costs associated with the benefits offered. Among the functions available in the application, other companies have the same function with lower performance and … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement I have not used anything else other than Adobe Acrobat and PDFelement meets all my needs and is easier to use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement is not only much much easier to use but it is less expensive. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement I haven't used any other product besides PDFelement. I found a product that I love and I'm sticking with it. I will say that I went with PDFelement based on reviews and based on the features that this product supplies vs. the others. I trust the company behind PDFelement (been … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement is superior to PDFzilla and comparable in features to Adobe and a better price. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
78% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
78% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
78% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
89% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| Wondershare PDFelement | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Esker Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Wondershare PDFelement | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 |
| Usability | 8.6 |
| Availability | 10.0 |
| Performance | 7.5 |
| Support Rating | 8.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 |
| Configurability | 10.0 |
| Ease of integration | 7.5 |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | 10.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 10.0 |
| Wondershare PDFelement | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Reliability and Availability |
|
| Performance |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Implementation Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Scalability |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | Wondershare PDFelement Screenshots      |
