Planview AgilePlace vs. Planview Hub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
Planview Hub
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Planview Hub provides scalable, sophisticated near real-time integrations to help IT leaders and their teams eliminate inefficiencies.N/A
Pricing
Planview AgilePlacePlanview Hub
Editions & Modules
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Planview AgilePlacePlanview Hub
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll editions include unlimited boards.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Planview AgilePlacePlanview Hub
Considered Both Products
Planview AgilePlace
Chose Planview AgilePlace
AgilePlace is better than JIRA when it comes to ease of use and intuitiveness of the tool. Card based model and ability to customize/tailor the way you want makes AgilePlace is a great tool. Look and feel as well as colored cards, makes the board layout much more easier to …
Chose Planview AgilePlace
All these tools are different and have different uses. Depending upon SDLC your organization uses, you would use any of these tools. They all have their plusses and minuses.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
We use both tools together as they have different benefits and provide value in various ways.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
I personally much prefer AgilePlace over Jira. It is much easier to organize your work and keep track of a wide variety of different types of work.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Another poorly designed question that forces me to choose a random response from the list of products, in order to allow me to move on in this survey.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Much easier to use for simple projects.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration.

In …
Chose Planview AgilePlace
I use Trello a bit for personal use. It's much less powerful than LeanKit, but it's also a better design and simpler to use. ServiceNow has some kanban board stuff built-in, but I wasn't super impressed with it. JIRA seemed to be even more complex than LeanKit for the short …
Chose Planview AgilePlace
LeanKit functionality and usability make it a perfect tool for agile project management.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
LeanKit seems to be more baked and more mature. The others listed are a little more siloed.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
I think that LeanKit is very similar to Asana's Kanban feature and Trello, but is much less sleek looking than Asana. Asana's clean and sleek UI makes me enjoy project management much more than LeanKit. It might sound silly that the UI makes so much of a difference to me, but …
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Leankit was already in use when I joined the organization.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Our company uses LeanKit, Pivotal Tracker, and Trello. It all depends on what team you're on. There's even a team that just does KanBan on a whiteboard. In the end, I would tank LeanKit above Pivotal Tracker, but below Trello. The differences are relatively subtle between …
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Both VersionOne and Trello are good products. VersionOne is for the real hardcore Agile shops who want to track and report on everything related to the Agile process. Trello is a tool that works for Agile, but really is just a simple list making/tracking tool. Both tools serve …
Chose Planview AgilePlace
[We selected LeanKit over alternatives because it is an] All in one solution.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
I have used Trello, which is not as robust for tracking and customizing workflows as
LeanKit is. It does not scale well to big teams. JIRA is the standard project management software but does not support Kanban well.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Nearly all the other tools I evaluated against are free, so that's one area where LeanKit is not as competitive. LeanKit does allow the experience to be much more customizable, though.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
Being from QA I prefer Spiratest and QC for the fact my team can do all our work in one program and it is linked. But the tech department as a whole prefers Leankit as it is the tool of choice based on ease of use and overall performance.
Chose Planview AgilePlace
While LeanKit was not designed for project and task management, we selected it because of its collaborative nature as a project and task management platform for our marketing team. It was also selected because our engineering and product management teams were using Leankit. We …
Planview Hub
Chose Planview Hub
We’ve evaluated other integration tools—OpsHub, Jama Connect Interchange, and Symphony from agosense—and selected Planview TaskTop Hub because of its ease of use, scalability, and flexibility for managing and extending the integration concepts with new tools.
Chose Planview Hub
JIRA Align does not synch items outside of JIRA and Azure Dev Ops; TT Hub is specifically utilized to address connections to various other SDLC application.
Features
Planview AgilePlacePlanview Hub
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
7.4
Ratings
1% below category average
Planview Hub
-
Ratings
Task Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
8.8
Ratings
12% above category average
Planview Hub
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
-
Ratings
Planview Hub
8.1
Ratings
2% above category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Planview AgilePlacePlanview Hub
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Planview AgilePlacePlanview Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.7
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Planview AgilePlacePlanview Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
AgilePlace is a great way for teams, or individuals, to bring visibility to the work in process and in their backlog. The color coding and icon use helps to quickly analyze the type of work or status of the work. The product team is doing a good job at listening to their user's feedback and implementing improvements. Where it falls short is when reporting needs to occur.
Read full review
If used correctly in the hub/spoke model it can be very effective. If not implemented in this manner, it can lead to a lot of customizations to accommodate.
Read full review
Pros
  • Okta Integration: We love using SSO for all our SaaS apps, and as new team members join, they can be automatically joined to the appropriate LeanKit boards.
  • Filtering and viewing: Can filter and refine by several fields as well as custom fields. Assigned Users, Tagged, Card Type, Date, etc
  • Their analytics and reporting can be helpful for PMs, especially if they have several teams they oversee.
Read full review
  • Allows for one- vs bi-directional field flow which is useful per segment
  • Allows for the relationship mapping of Parent/Child cards
  • Allows for customization of mapped fields
Read full review
Cons
  • The formatting of what they call "cards" could be better. They can be clunky if you have a lot of text in just one.
  • Needs better support for media, attachments.
  • Not the most pretty interface in my opinion, though it works.
Read full review
  • I'd like to see more robust reporting capabilities available from the UI.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
we are happy with the tool and the service and continuos improvement of the tool so there is no need yet to change to another one.
Read full review
Planview TaskTop Hub supports our use cases. I think its continuous development goes in the right direction.
Read full review
Usability
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Read full review
A great integration tool, which comes with a wide range of supported end tools. Planview TaskTop Hub works with an integration concept that maximizes the scalability and flexibility of integrations across more than just two tools. For example, from our experience, we started with the integration between Jama Connect and Jira. We were able to extend our integration concept to a new tool, Pro Cloud Server, by ourselves. The element was synced within 10 minutes.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Not experienced any outage
Read full review
We're hosting Planview TaskTop Hub by ourselves. The availability was good until now. A part of that, we have a strict plan for the quality control on any update of both Hub and End tools to avoid as much as possibily any disruptions.
Read full review
Performance
Larger boards take longer to load
Read full review
Planview TaskTop Hub does generate traffic for some end tools. It is still in an acceptable range. For certain kind of retry to resolve issue in synchronizing relationships, an additional manual attention was required.
Read full review
Support Rating
Every time I have reached out to the AgilePlace support team I have received a timely response in addition to professional & personal feedback. Their consultants are knowledgeable and the management team is happy to jump in and help when needed.
Read full review
I was considering giving a rating between 9 and 10. Overall, the support has been very good so far. However, I have noticed that the members of the support team have varying levels of know-how about Planview TaskTop Hub. When a ticket about a complex technical issue reaches a member such as Christoph T., Sr. Customer Engineer, the analysis is done thoroughly, and a sustainable solution is provided. With other members of the support team, the experience might be different.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
We've received a good, in-deep training from Christoph T. during the implementation phase.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The integration documentation was sufficient.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Very easy.
Read full review
We had a very good collaboration with the enabling team from Tasktop in 2018. The enablement program was adequately structured, starting with building an integration concept based on use cases of the synchronized data. The training provided a good foundation for us to operate and maintain the tool. The tool administration and architecture were straightforward.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration. In the end, we picked Planview LeanKit because of several reasons: Aesthetics: The look was much more clean and professional. Reporting: It was obvious from the start that we could use Planview LeanKit as a tool for improvement. API: We needed to integrate the Kanban into our central systems and Planview LeanKit API was (and still is) a way to do it. Card Headers: This sounds like a simple thing, but the headers above the titles fit our work perfectly and looked perfect, which helped the decision.
Read full review
N/A - We have not used or evaluated other products similar to Planview TaskTop Hub
Read full review
Scalability
Good use cases for small/large teams
Read full review
We don't need to deploy Planview TaskTop Hub in other units but we could extend the integration to cover the new data, new data type and new projects.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our team meetings are more direct and quick to get through thanks to the better visibility of the workload
  • Easily being able to move cards between team lanes gives instant visibility to where the responsibility for the next step is needed.
Read full review
  • It is a little expensive but seems to be acceptable costs for what it does.
  • It allows us to integrate better the whole set of systems used in software development.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview AgilePlace Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-Time Analytics: Utilize board health metrics involving bottlenecks, WIP, and throughput to guide the optimization of workflows, improve velocity, and better prioritize efforts for more predictable delivery. Lean and Agile metrics can be used to assess team performance and promote continuous improvement.Screenshot of PI Planning: Offers enterprise Kanban boards to visualize the work of teams regardless of the methodologies they apply or workflows they follow, and insights into progress and create opportunities for better alignment.Screenshot of Dependency Visualization and Management: Surfaces risks to plans resulting from cross-team dependency conflicts, blockers, and capacity constraints, and helps drive proactive measures to enable teams to deliver on time.Screenshot of Team Planning and Coordination: Boards can be used to breakdown work, build and manage plans, and execute against strategy to deliver more value to customers, faster.

Planview Hub Screenshots

Screenshot of Monitor ROI and usage to measure integration's impact on the business.Screenshot of Visualize the integration landscapeScreenshot of Pre-built connectors for over sixty toolsScreenshot of Model-based integration is scalable