TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Planview AgilePlace

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AAgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.

    $19

    per user, per month

    PractiTest

    Score8 out of 10
    N/APractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.

    $39

    user

    Pricing
    Planview AgilePlacePractiTest
    Editions & Modules
    Teams
    $19
    per user, per month
    Scaled Teams
    $29
    per user, per month
    Custom
    Contact Sales for Quote
    per user, per month
    Professional
    $39.00
    user
    Enterprise
    $49.00
    user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Planview AgilePlacePractiTest
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsAll editions include unlimited boards.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Planview AgilePlacePractiTest
    Considered Both Products
    Planview
    No answer on this topic
    PractiTest
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    16 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Planview AgilePlacePractiTest
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Planview AgilePlace and PractiTest
    Feature
    Planview AgilePlace
    7.4
    25 Ratings
    1% below category average
    PractiTest
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management10.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management9.921 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts10.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling9.919 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology9.320 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology4.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management6.57 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration7.319 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access2.114 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking6.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management7.29 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools7.39 Ratings00 Ratings
    Agile Development
    Comparison of Agile Development features of Planview AgilePlace and PractiTest
    Feature
    Planview AgilePlace
    8.8
    8 Ratings
    14% above category average
    PractiTest
    -
    Ratings
    DevOps Tool Integrations8.15 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dependencies and Blockers9.68 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Planview AgilePlace and PractiTest
    Feature
    Planview AgilePlace
    -
    Ratings
    PractiTest
    8.5
    4 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Planview AgilePlacePractiTest
    Small Businesses
    monday dev
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Targetprocess
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
    Score8.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Planview AgilePlacePractiTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (31 ratings)
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.6
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    8.3
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.3
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.3
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Planview AgilePlacePractiTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Planview
    This tool enables the visual management needed in many offshore teams to easily and quickly see the pending work, work in progress and completed work.For teams that work with a waterfall methodology and do not have AGILE internalized, I believe there are other solutions from Planview or other providers.
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Planview
    • Visual kanban board that is easy to customize as the team's needs change
    • Real time collaboration allowing teams working remotely to stay up to date on current status
    • Allows versatility for how a team needs to capture details on the work at hand by utilizing card icons, card types and custom data points
    • Card scoring is easy to setup and provides the team the ability to set values to better prioritize their backlog
    • Ability to add card automation to take out some of the repetitive manual actions
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    • Effective Test case template.
    • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
    • Report generation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Planview
    • Ability to add more than 1 visual cue to the card. We use custom icons and sometimes more than 1 is appropriate but you have to choose which is most important since only 1 can be applied.
    • Better visibility to board access from the user administration screens. Currently have to run 1-2 reports to see this information. Would like to be able to click on a user within Configure Users and see what boards they have access to quickly.
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Planview
    we are happy with the tool and the service and continuos improvement of the tool so there is no need yet to change to another one.
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Planview
    LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Planview
    Not experienced any outage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Planview
    Larger boards take longer to load
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Planview
    Every time I have reached out to the AgilePlace support team I have received a timely response in addition to professional & personal feedback. Their consultants are knowledgeable and the management team is happy to jump in and help when needed.
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Planview
    Very easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Planview
    Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration. In the end, we picked Planview LeanKit because of several reasons: Aesthetics: The look was much more clean and professional. Reporting: It was obvious from the start that we could use Planview LeanKit as a tool for improvement. API: We needed to integrate the Kanban into our central systems and Planview LeanKit API was (and still is) a way to do it. Card Headers: This sounds like a simple thing, but the headers above the titles fit our work perfectly and looked perfect, which helped the decision.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Planview
    Good use cases for small/large teams
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Planview
    • LeanKit has made it easier for new employees to understand other employees' roles in the company by seeing their workload.
    • It makes it clear who is responsible for what project so that there is more accountability at our company.
    • It helps our project manager schedule new projects in a way that we all can see.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PractiTest
    • Test Reporting
    • Defect Management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Planview AgilePlace Screenshots

    Screenshot of Real-Time Analytics: Utilize board health metrics involving bottlenecks, WIP, and throughput to guide the optimization of workflows, improve velocity, and better prioritize efforts for more predictable delivery. Lean and Agile metrics can be used to assess team performance and promote continuous improvement.Screenshot of PI Planning: Offers enterprise Kanban boards to visualize the work of teams regardless of the methodologies they apply or workflows they follow, and insights into progress and create opportunities for better alignment.Screenshot of Dependency Visualization and Management: Surfaces risks to plans resulting from cross-team dependency conflicts, blockers, and capacity constraints, and helps drive proactive measures to enable teams to deliver on time.Screenshot of Team Planning and Coordination: Boards can be used to breakdown work, build and manage plans, and execute against strategy to deliver more value to customers, faster.

    PractiTest Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot