Prokuria vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Prokuria	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Prokuria is a cloud-based procurement platform, presented as easy to customize, fast-to-start and intuitive with a simple interface to drive greater adoption across departments. RFIs, RFPs, RFQs Streamline sourcing decisions with Prokuria's technology - digitized data and features such as: Sealed Bids, Message Center, Supplier Engagement Monitoring, Internal Collaboration, Smart Alerts & Reminders,…	$20 user/month
Zip Intake-to-Procure	Score 7.9 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.	N/A

Pricing

Prokuria

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Editions & Modules

Basic Plan: $20
user/month
Standard Plan: $60
user/month
White-labeling Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
DocuSign integration Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
Set-up Purchase Request Flow Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
Set-up Purchase Orders Flow Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
Premium Plan: $180
user/month
Enterprise Plan: Price on request
API integrations Add-on: Price on request
Custom developments Add-on: Price on request

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

$15 per user per month

No setup fee

Additional Details

Basic Plan includes: - Suppliers directory - Supplier segmentation - Supplier scorecard - Contracts Repository - Items catalog - Custom fields - 25 GB Storage Standard Plan includes Everything in Basic, plus: - RFIs & RFPs & RFQs - Update Data Campaigns - Live messaging with suppliers - Projects - Suppliers onboarding form - Supplier surveys - Automated workflows - 25 GB Storage - max 50 suppliers in an event Premium Plan includes Everything in Standard, plus: - Public sourcing events - Reverse & Forward Auction - Dutch Auction - Advanced Allocation Auctions - Advanced fields & form logic - Advanced workflows - 100 GB Storage - max 100 suppliers in an event Enterprise Plan includes everything you need to roll out a sourcing platform at scale perfectly matching your procedures and process. All plans are billed quarterly. Free Trial available - No credit card required!

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure

Best Alternatives
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.9 out of 10	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Precoro Score 9.4 out of 10	Precoro Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises	SAP S/4HANA Cloud Score 8.5 out of 10	SAP S/4HANA Cloud Score 8.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.7 (22 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	Prokuria No answers on this topic	Zip Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Prokuria No answers on this topic	Zip No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org. Visibility to the user in a great user interface Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool Chanie Wiesenberg Director of Finance at Gong.io Read full review
Cons	Prokuria No answers on this topic	Zip There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Prokuria No answers on this topic	Zip Incredibly responsive and helpful. Incentivized SH Shana Hawkins Procurement Specialist Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Prokuria No answers on this topic	Zip I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs. Incentivized Nick Huffman Category Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	Prokuria No answers on this topic	Zip Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process. Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool. No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings. Incentivized EZ emily zhang Sr Manager, Procurement Operations Read full review
ScreenShots	Prokuria Screenshots	Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots