Proposable is a sales proposal automation software solution offered by Proposable.
$19
per user/per month
Workday Strategic Sourcing
Score6.1 out of 10
N/A
Workday Strategic Sourcing supports procurement by automating source-to-contract processes, from project intake to supplier management, and by surfacing contract obligations. It leverages Workday AI to provide insights and conversational tools that help teams identify savings opportunities and mitigate supplier risk.
N/A
Pricing
Proposable
Workday Strategic Sourcing
Editions & Modules
Solo
$19
per user/per month
Team
$39
per user/per month
Enterprise
500+
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Proposable
Workday Strategic Sourcing
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Proposable
Workday Strategic Sourcing
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Proposable and Workday Strategic Sourcing
Feature
Proposable
7.8
3 Ratings
0% above category average
Workday Strategic Sourcing
-
Ratings
Proposal branding
9.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Proposal templates
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Proposal content library updates
6.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided proposal creation
5.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Searchable proposal database
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Proposable and Workday Strategic Sourcing
Feature
Proposable
8.5
3 Ratings
8% above category average
Workday Strategic Sourcing
-
Ratings
RFP management & response
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Proposable and Workday Strategic Sourcing
It is a great solution for small to medium-sized businesses. It is fairly customizable, and their support team has been great to work with us. They have helped us build some custom workflows to push a customer straight to a credit card page once they sign the proposal. This has really helped increase conversions when signing on a new customer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Scout RP is wonderful to help keep an RFP very organized. It is excellent to have a single version, so that all team members helping compile an RFP response have a single place to know that they are on the current version. If a company doesn't want to respond within Scout RFP, it's my understanding that the RFP information can be exported from Scout RFP, compiled in a different tool (like XLS), and then pulled back into Scout RFP for submission. From a collaboration standpoint, there's not an easy way to "assign" questions or items. Sometimes at my company, we need different experts to answer different questions. We have to use another tool, like email or Slack, to let that person know he/she needs to answer. However, in other tools, a certain block can be assigned to the person internally within the tool.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I didn't choose Proposable over DocuSign, but I did use it at a previous company. Proposable is great for the smaller business and makes the creation and sending of agreements so easy! DocuSign was nice, but it was more complex in my experience and created a bottleneck for our sales team to get approval. I'm sure this was more of our own internal process, but between the two, Proposable was much faster to get what you needed in the form of an agreement. Less time freed up more time for selling!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have only used RFPIO to facilitate searching for RFP answers. I have used Scout RFP only to respond to customer RFPs. I assume they have functional overlap, but my interactions with each have not included this functional overlap. For each tool's respective use, I have found them very simple, intuitive, and helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info