Qualys TruRisk Platform vs. SpiraPlan
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Qualys TruRisk Platform | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys TruRisk Platform (formerly Qualys Cloud Platform, or Qualysguard), from San Francisco-based Qualys, is network security and vulnerability management software featuring app scanning and security, network device mapping and detection, vulnerability prioritization schedule and remediation, and other features to provide vulnerability management and network attack surface reduction. | N/A |
SpiraPlan | Score8.3 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | SpiraPlan is an enterprise agile project management solution. Some key features include: Requirements Management, Release Planning and Iteration/Sprint Planning. SpiraPlan helps users manage tasks, issues, code, and workflows. Additionally, SpiraPlan includes an enterprise risk management system that is fully integrated with the requirements and project management features. | $219 per month (3 concurrent users) |
| Qualys TruRisk Platform | SpiraPlan | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Billed monthly or annually, by concurrent users. Discount for annual billing. Annual billing only for downloaded version. Billed at a minimum 3 concurrent users. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Qualys TruRisk Platform | SpiraPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
85% Would buy again 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
87% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
85% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Qualys TruRisk Platform | SpiraPlan | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Qualys TruRisk Platform | SpiraPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 | PTC Windchill RV&S Score2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 | ![]() IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Score5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Qualys TruRisk Platform | SpiraPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 7.0 |
| Usability | 2.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 5.0 | - |
| Qualys TruRisk Platform | SpiraPlan | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | SpiraPlan Screenshots |

