Rchilli vs. Snaphunt

This is a great tool if you need to imbed the functionality (as we have done). Perhaps not a well suited to standalone use.

When it comes to finding relevant and competent candidate profiles, Snaphunt has actually done a better job for us than many other reputable job boards and recruitment platforms. Basically, we've been running a major portion of our recruitment process on autopilot since signing up on Snaphunt. There's hardly any lag time between a role opening up and the vacancy details being posted on the platform. Features like the available JD templates allow us to quickly punch in all requirements for the position. From there, Snaphunt's efficient applicant tracking and screening system does the rest

• Parsing of Candidate Resumes with good accuracy
• Around 70 to 80 different Candidate Fields
• Supports Individual, Bulk Online and Offline Parsing

• Finding candidates
• Screening candidates
• Helpful tips in recruiting process
• Very good documentation

• So far, we have nothing to complain about.

• Up until now, I have not disliked anything on the platform. The experience has been good.

We recently evaluated Azure Cognitive AI Services. It was not economical and we were asked to partner with another partner of Microsoft for specific Resume Parsing Services. Looking at the cost benefits, efficiency of parsing and ease of use of RChilli, we decided to continue with our very good partner RChilli

Snaphunt does a better job when it comes to talent discovery and providing the right profiles for our open positions. Despite managing a vast pool of global talent, the platform delivers candidate profiles with matching skills and competencies better than most other job boards out there. On top of that, the user interface is simple and the screen is usually uncluttered, which makes for an even more efficient user experience for our recruiters.

• Using Rchilli saved us thousands of dollars in development costs and avoided on-going maintenance.
• Using their taxonomy's means we don't have to maintain our own, saving us time and subscription costs.

• Return of investment
• Saving time