Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Windows Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Windows Server
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWindows Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPWindows Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWindows Server
Considered Both Products
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Windows Server

No answer on this topic

Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWindows Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
6.8
9 Ratings
16% below category average
Windows Server
-
Ratings
IDE support6.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation5.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating System
Comparison of Operating System features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
-
Ratings
Windows Server
7.8
5 Ratings
9% below category average
File Management00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Software Application Management00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
System Update Frequency00 Ratings6.65 Ratings
Operating System Security00 Ratings7.65 Ratings
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWindows Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(8 ratings)
9.2
(68 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(3 ratings)
9.2
(12 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(3 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(2 ratings)
6.4
(19 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(3 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWindows Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
Microsoft
Windows Server and Active Directory is very robust and stable, it has been a staple in every IT environment I have worked in during my career. Junior to Intermediate admins can learn Windows Server easily, the user interfaces make administration tasks very easy as well as the documentation available through a vast amount of resources. There are other Operating Systems available with no GUI which has a smaller attack surface, faster update installation and reboot time. Windows Server does have the ability to remove the desktop experience, however it is not something I have had experience with and I believe most administrators choose not to remove it.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Backup of workstations & itself - reliably, consistently, with Bare-Metal Restore and deduplication
  • File management and Security on a per file/folder/user basis is simple and fully done through an easy GUI
  • DNS, DHCP server functions are easy to configure using the built-in GUI
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Difficult to replicate configuration outside of a container environment
  • Still requires quite a bit of knowledge of the CLI
  • Integration with deployment tools requires CLI knowledge
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft needs to minimize the update frequency by making the product more secure. It can become very exhausting trying to keep updated if you don't have a dedicated support team. It can become challenging where the business is unable to allow downtime for reboots as part of the update process.
  • Prone to security and audit vulnerabilities.
  • The operating system needs more CPU and memory resources compared to other options such as Linux.
  • Understanding the licensing model can be abit confusing.
  • Comes with a standard firewall, but not the most secured one available. Would suggest using a more secured firewall as part of your antivirus software.
  • Due to the number of vulnerabilities and the operating system being a target for hackers, anti-virus software is a must.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
Microsoft
I've carefully reviewed the servers and services currently running on Windows Server 2012, and given the opportunity would renew them as is going forward. There are two systems I currently have in place, one is a very large Linux implementation for a large ecommerce site, and one is a very large backup solution front ended by FTP servers running Linux. Neither are well suited for Windows, but the overall network infrastructure is and will be Windows Server for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Usability
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
Microsoft
Anyone new to IT could easily use the familiar Desktop Experience (GUI) version because we all know how to use Windows, whether a client or server version. Once an IT user is more comfortable with the operating system, they can move on to the Core version, which is the way to go in almost all situations.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
some times server hungs and user sessions were busy to connect
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is lightweight and doesn't really consumes much physical resources. It's high performing and suites well for high transaction Java enterprise applications. The out of box performance settings are not really great and you will have to configure the settings to suite your environment to leverage it's full benefits.
Read full review
Microsoft
need to improve the performance more
Read full review
Support Rating
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft's support is hugely wide-ranging from articles online to having to contact them directly for the more serious issues. In recent years when I have contacted them directly, I have found the support o be excellent as I have found myself connected to very knowledgeable people in the field in which I needed the support. The online support available is vast and I tend to find most of the time that there is always someone out there who has had the same issue as me in the past and knows something about how to resolve it! This is the advantage of using industry standard and long-established systems such as Windows Server.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
it was my senior who trained Windows Server features and i was satisfied
Read full review
Online Training
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
it was recorded session and useful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Make sure that you have detailed processes in place for every server instance you plan to install/upgrade, if possible get the base OS loaded and Windows Updates applied ahead of time, and if using a VM take a snapshot prior to installing each role, as well as along the way.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
Microsoft
They are different experiences, and while the other solutions offer enterprise-grade stability and, in some cases, address Windows server shortcomings (such as patching), they all do the trick, but the other solutions require a deeper technical background/configuration of items at the command line, which some people are not fully comfortable with.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
need to reduce a lot
Read full review
Scalability
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
yes i completely agree multi deployment
Read full review
Professional Services
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
i like the professional service but need to improve
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Ability to keep all files in one place and give access to users makes file management easy to control.
  • VPN Access to off-site users is a plus.
  • Secure access to on-site SQL data from our accounting and estimating data is a plus.
Read full review
ScreenShots